jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 13TH DAY #61 *may contain graphic and adult content*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
We send our thoughts out to Mike who is spending the day at the Phoenix Spa and Sun where he is recovering from a Brain Scramble.
 
If she was where she says on that map of the room, wouldn't Travis be between her and the closet she says she ran to?
 
SNIT, I keep getting fade on two of my feeds. Gotta find another one.
 
Here we go!!!!! Juan is going to start breaking down the 1 min 46 sec of the murder

Step

By

Step
 
such clear recall, except when she cant recall a damned thing

go JM
 
I think more than her head is heading SOUTH!!:floorlaugh:
 
yes .. . part of it . . . don't know if the transcriber put a period there or not
objection - half dozen times - sustained!

first time ever seen that specific camera
yes that I recall
been to TA home between april 2008 and june 4 2008 when you killed him you bought the camera
yes

never seen his camera before . ..
based on that solely - that is correct
you saw his camera before
yes
he posted a picture of himself taking a picture of his whole self in the mirror in bathroom
first time you touched his camera june 4 2008 -
yes
first opportunity to get familiar with that camera. . yes . . . took photos but you were unsuccessful with taking video - correct . . .unfamiliar with camera? yes . . not read instructions . . .don't remember the time - I guess time on photos . . . what do you remember? what are you cognizant? don't know

have not deleted any photos from that camera
um previously - about the pictures of me
photos taken on the bed . . . you said he deleted
objection - they said both did
I believe he deleted - I don't remember how it happened

you don't remember - objection - sustained
you didn't delete the sex photos
I might have deleted them . . .I believe he did but it might have been me
if your belief he deleted then
if you believe the belief - yes

all your testimony is your belief . . isn't it?

you believe it was TA deleting photos after having sex on the bed
I believe it is likely him . .
if he was the one deleting photos - up til then you haven't deleted any photos on his camera
not necessarily - not correct

you took other photos that day?
yes in the shower
we are not there yet
I don't know you go in circles

do you have any problem that is the topicd
no

you believe TA deleted the photos - he usually deleted I don't know - you just told us that . . yes I did . .. next time you two are using the camera - at that time you are taking photos - you had never deleted anything off his camera.
I believe it is possible but can't say definitively

the ones of the sex, the ones of the shower and the involuntary ones
yes
between the sex and the shower you didn't believe you delete
I believe but not definitively
is that what you believe . . . is that the truth
I believe I said that
if we are going on your belief for the truth - you wanted pics in the shower to get calvin kline look - yes
you had not deleted any images from that camera
no that is not correct

ok tell me when you deleted photos from that camera between sex pics and shower pics . . .
I can't say definitively when or even if . . I believe TA deleted them

seconds after from taking photos - when did you delete pics/
either of us could have
the question is WHEN did you do anything to delete photos from his camera
some time after the photos that were deleted were taken

didn't delete sex photos . . . not familiar with camera with how to delete
at what point
first time f or you . . .
yes

this photo #160 and that this 5:30:30 June 4 2008 - you handle camera when this picture was taken - door open - TA was seated there . . . that is also an inadvertent photo

camera was twirling and coming down when this pic was taken
no not correct
I have no idea . . .we were moving it I kept showing him take one - show him -

this is the last of the sequence . . . before there is the other shot of the ceiling #161 on the ceiling
that is correct
so are you saying this was not an inadvertent photo
no -
what were circumstances?
if my finger inadvertently hit the shutter
is that what you did?
obviously
this one is in focus . . . #161 is not focus . . .

this is inadvertent photo and aimed @ individual and focus
all those pics were intended to be waist up shots

you were holding camera securely . .
don't know secure
this photo taken when apply pressure to the button
how it works
this photo not out focus - nothing tells us it is inadvertent

from the photo itself it is inadvertent I wouldn't take a picture of that
his buttocks - did he get mad
no he wasn't
he wasn't angry at that point
this is the point 6/4/08 5:30:30 - was he angry
no

were you both talking when photos were taken?
yes
was this for you
it was for him - that is why on his camera

on the tape w/Det Flores it took a lot of convincing
it was my idea

Exhibit #159 - he is now sitting down - you directed him on where to be and how to sit.

(picture of TA looking @ camera)

he is standing at one point and he is sitting down . . .right before the attack happened he is sitting - yes

that was with the water - water did the work (directing_

this man's physical position inside the shower - standing & sitting . . let's look @ one of them #141 he is standing there - you are taking photos

#159 he is now seated . . . you are the one telling him which position to get Calvin Kline look - something to that effect.

you are person taking photos - you are telling him stand this way or sit down
it was mutual
no one asked if he consented to sit
yes and him - both of us
you behind the lens - want a certain look - with the water - calvin kline look -

pics wanted for Cancun or calvin kline
it is not for cancun
wanted to pose for you - proud of his body - pictures of his body before cancun
it's both (calvin & cancun)

what are we talking about
the . . . .
the cancun issue . . .do you remember we are talking about TA . . . that is why you are here because you killed him
(whisper yes)

he was going to Cancun - he was proud of his body - working out - he would be able to wear whatever swimwear on the beach . . wanted to memorialize that with a picture
not worded that way but correct

told Det it takes lot of convincing - yeah in Jan it did
why convincing if he wanted photos . .. . did he or not want photos - pick one

6/4/08 photo session . . . yes did want photos taken or no needed convincing either one . . .tell me. . .
he needed convincing but he wanted it on June 4th
did not say that on interview on July 16th
I didn't specify

what are we talking about?
why you having conflict with these statements you
object

#249 - blue print schematic diagram of TA's bath . . .ncludees close and bedroom - yes

rope was right here behind the bed?
that is right

these photos were taken @ some point #161 . . . ceiling photo 5:31:14
door to the shower - light above shower - TA is seated down here - yes
he hasn't moved . . .
you were standing?
I was kneeling @ this point
door to the closet

exhibit - blue print
where were you when this phot was snapped

slightly to the left of circle #4
right in front of shower - a few feet back - no water on camera - TA wwas still seated

JA was kneeling - distance between her and floor not that great

photo #160 - TA sitting on floor of shower - I was kneeling . . . about 2'? . . . lens had a zoom - a few feet . . .

we were looking @ pictures reviewing them . . .

photo @ 5:30:30 . . . then other photo of ceiling were you in the same area -
same general spot - there was some adjusting

a couple of feet away . . . dropped the camera
I did
I dropped it when facing it did a little double and landed right about here

camera rolled how far
didn't touch but sort of against bathtub
dividing wall between shower and bath . . .
didn't hit porceline of the bathtub

there was bathmat here?
I just know there was a shower mat there
camera here?

camera comes to rest in this position
TA snapped . . .he got very angry - got out shower . . . I remember f word . . . . he said f@cking idiot . . . as he was standing up . . . . don't know exact position . . . he is within about 2 feet of you
somewhere like that

I was a few feet so water would not splash . .
he gets very upset . . .
he gets mean look in his face
when he picked me up I saw that look

same look from Aug 2007
I have seen that look many times
Aug 2007 same mean look
very similar
same mean look?
yes

Aug 2007 he grabbed your wrist . . . .say I am sorry and held you

now something else happen
yes many somethings later
he body slammed me
down - very forceful way
right in the same area on the tile - my head would be facing south . . . .

even though he slammed you really hard you were congnizent to know your head facing south - that is where I went . . I wasn't thinking south . . .
remember head was in this direction
yes I do

not hit your head so hard made you lose memory
I don't think so
you remember your head being this way
ido
objection - overrule

I don't know about head injury but I remember that direction - more or less body was somewhat parallel with that area
you head facing that way?
yes
 
Nurmi needs to stop objecting and giving her the answers!!! He reinforces her "IDK" defense... Reminding her to say she doesn't remember

Sent from my HTCEVOV4G using Tapatalk 2
 
He left it wide open for her to say she hit her head HARD ....
 
Travis stood her up and she saw a mean look in his face, so she killed him.
 
I have said it before and I'll say it again, There is no way in hell he became so enraged over a dropped camera that he had to die. Over a camera. :gavel:

Dropped a camera from 2 feet off the ground onto a mat. Wow!
 
This will be where her story falls apart...lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
136
Guests online
1,969
Total visitors
2,105

Forum statistics

Threads
602,353
Messages
18,139,553
Members
231,361
Latest member
Curious38
Back
Top