Josh Duggar charged with Receipt/Possession Child Sexual Abuse Material, 29 April 2021 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t know how Anna will recover from something as horrible as this, if in fact the charges are proven. She will soon have 7 children to support. How betrayed she must feel. I think deep in her heart she knows he did this. But Jim Bob being the patriarch of the whole brood has probably ordered her to shush. I hope she will take her children away immediately if for no other reason than to get physical distance.
He's really made a mess for her to deal with. Not only does she have to deal with how she is going to react (leave? stay?), figure out how to support the kids on her own, and how to keep her children safe, etc., she also has to explain to the kids where Daddy is.

He put all that on her to handle in the public eye, while I betcha anything there is pressure on her to be sweetly supportive to him, without any consideration by that gang about who is going to supportive to her.

jmo
 
Question: how easy is it to innocently come into possession of CSAM? Is it as simple as the sender emailing the wrong recipient? Can CSAM be a pop-up in a legal *advertiser censored* webpage?
No. And it seems that only perps who have multiple files from different websites ever claim that they 'accidentally' downloaded stuff like that, hundreds, if not thousands of times.
 
The judge himself indicated Josh would have to find a "3rd party home with no minors present" if he was able to make bond. So I assume that possibility exists?

I can see Josh and his attorney denying he knowingly downloaded child *advertiser censored*. In other cases, I've seen the defendant say images of children were buried within the file of "adult" images they downloaded.
A third party home could mean a community judicial placement ie. half way house, residential group home, etc. In any case, I doubt the Court will allow him to be released to a family member.
 
The judge himself indicated Josh would have to find a "3rd party home with no minors present" if he was able to make bond. So I assume that possibility exists?

I can see Josh and his attorney denying he knowingly downloaded child *advertiser censored*. In other cases, I've seen the defendant say images of children were buried within the file of "adult" images they downloaded.
A third party home could mean a community judicial placement ie. half way house, residential group home, etc. In any case, I doubt the Court will allow him to be released to a family member.
 
This is very not surprising, given he molested his sisters and the person he was sent to to deal with that situation, ended up in prison for CSA material as well. I wonder if Josh’s dad sent him to that guy because he knew that guy was into kids.

Absolutely nothing would surprise me about that family. I do feel bad for his wife, and their kids, even if he never abused any of them (which, IMNSHO, is unlikely).

I wonder if anyone has started a , or its equivalent, for his wife.
 
I work with child trafficking victims and have been privy to many steps in these investigations. I won't bog the thread down with unrelated, or aside conversations, but there are many reasons I think these investigations take too long. There is so m1uch unnecessary red tape, especially when the perpetrator is known to the public. The federal government would never give warning of an imminent arrest to your neighbor for the same charges. Investigations into people like him are unnecessarily lengthy, and usually to the benefit of the perpetrator.

I'm okay with it if it means he definitely will be going away for a very long time and will definitely not get the chance to do it again.
 
No. And it seems that only perps who have multiple files from different websites ever claim that they 'accidentally' downloaded stuff like that, hundreds, if not thousands of times.

Exploitative images of children are so hard to access, if someone's interested in it and finds a source, they're going to feel like they hit the mother lode.
 
In the life of a narcissist, everybody around them only knows what the narcissist tells them. Ns compartmentalize people. They can spin a lie six different ways and get away with it as long as person A doesn’t run in the same circles as a persons B & C etc.
Anna is at home, clearly very busy putting her all into raising healthy, happy children. Whatever business ( or otherwise) dealings her husband has is only known to her by what he tells her. What does outside the home can be completely hidden from her. She pretty much has to believe whatever he tells her.
I know from experience that in a situation like this even if other people catch on to what the N is doing, they generally either assume that the wife already knows or aren’t willing to be the one to tell her. Often, the N lies to others about his home situation in order to gain sympathy or support from work colleagues, spiritual advisors or potential “extracurricular”partners. This is how an intelligent honest, loving wife can be totally oblivious to what her N husband is doing.
Thanks for this informative post.
In some other cases here at WS, the same has happened where an innocent partner was blindsided because they were isolated.

And it's sad to think that some women have no means (higher education than HS or a skill gained from work experiences) -- to break away and still be able to support their family.
One can imagine the pressure Josh's wife would be under from her in-laws.

But I think her own family would try to help her --I wish she'd take them up on any support/advice/offers of housing ?
Just saying, and Imo.
 
Anna will have to be very careful about the choices she makes going forward otherwise she risks losing custody of her children. DCFS is inclined to move first, ask questions later when it comes to the children of a parent(s) who are believed to be involved with CSAM. I doubt Jim & Michelle would be considered an appropriate placement until it is determined that they had no knowledge of Josh's activities. On the hope (assumption) that Anna was completely oblivious - and she very well may have been given that the alleged activities are believed to have occurred in Josh's workplace - my heart aches for her and the kids.
 
I did hear that at least one member of her extended family offered her assistance after Josh was arrested the first time, and she declined because she wanted to stay married to him. (Or maybe that decision was made for her.)
 
Click to expand
WS: Child *advertiser censored* Resources and Information
Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child *advertiser censored*

“18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
(Production of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(Possession, distribution and receipt of child *advertiser censored*)
18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child *advertiser censored*
18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States

Images of child *advertiser censored* are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child *advertiser censored* as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child *advertiser censored* are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child *advertiser censored* if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child *advertiser censored* using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child *advertiser censored* offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.

Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child *advertiser censored* across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child *advertiser censored* violation. Even if the child *advertiser censored* image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.

In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child *advertiser censored*.

Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child *advertiser censored* with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.

Any violation of federal child *advertiser censored* law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child *advertiser censored* under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child *advertiser censored* in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child *advertiser censored* offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.

It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child *advertiser censored* laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law.”

—-

Child *advertiser censored*

“Child *advertiser censored* Today

Because the term “child *advertiser censored*” is used in federal statutes, it is also commonly used by lawmakers, prosecutors, investigators, and the public to describe this form of sexual exploitation of children. However, this term fails to describe the true horror that is faced by countless children every year. The production of child *advertiser censored* creates a permanent record of a child’s sexual abuse. When these images are placed on the Internet and disseminated online, the victimization of the children continues in perpetuity. Experts and victims agree that victims depicted in child *advertiser censored* often suffer a lifetime of re-victimization by knowing the images of their sexual abuse are on the Internet forever. The children exploited in these images must live with the permanency, longevity, and circulation of such a record of their sexual victimization. This often creates lasting psychological damage to the child, including disruptions in sexual development, self-image, and developing trusting relationships with others in the future.

The expansion of the Internet and advanced digital technology lies parallel to the explosion of the child *advertiser censored* market. Child *advertiser censored* images are readily available through virtually every Internet technology, including social networking websites, file-sharing sites, photo-sharing sites, gaming devices, and even mobile apps. Child *advertiser censored* offenders can also connect on Internet forums and networks to share their interests, desires, and experiences abusing children, in addition to selling, sharing, and trading images.

These online communities have promoted communication and collaboration between child *advertiser censored* offenders, thereby fostering a larger relationship premised on a shared sexual interest in children. This has the effect of eroding the shame that typically would accompany this behavior, as well as desensitizing those involved to the physical and psychological damage caused to the child victims. For this reason, online communities attract and encourage new individuals to join them in the sexual exploitation of children.

The methods many offenders use to evade law enforcement detection have also become increasingly sophisticated. Purveyors of child *advertiser censored* continue to use various encryption techniques and anonymous networks on “The Dark Internet”, attempting to hide their amassed collections of illicit child abuse images. Several sophisticated online criminal organizations have even written security manuals to ensure that their members follow preferred security protocols and encryption techniques in an attempt to evade law enforcement and facilitate the sexual abuse of children.

Unfortunately, no area of the United States or country in the world is immune from individuals who seek to sexually exploit children through child *advertiser censored*. The continuous production and distribution of child *advertiser censored* increases the demand for new and more egregious images, perpetuating the continued molestation of child victims, as well as the abuse of new children.”
-more at link

—-

ICAC Task Force
Home

“The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program is a national network of 61 coordinated task forces representing over 4,500 federal, state, and local law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies. These agencies are continually engaged in proactive and reactive investigations and prosecutions of persons involved in child abuse and exploitation involving the Internet.”

——

Violent Crimes Against Children/Online Predators — FBI

“Investigations
Child Sexual Exploitation Investigations

Child sexual exploitation investigations—many of them undercover—are conducted in FBI field offices by Child Exploitation Task Forces (CETFs), which combine the resources of the FBI with those of other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Each of the FBI’s 56 field offices has worked investigations developed by the VCAC program, and many of our Legal Attaché offices have coordinated with appropriate foreign law enforcement partners on international investigations. Several of these investigations are also worked in coordination with Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Forces, which are funded by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, training is provided to all law enforcement involved in these investigations, including federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement agencies.“

Snip

“Investigative Priorities

Child abductions—child abductions, including domestic and international parental kidnapping
Child sexual exploitation enterprises—domestic child sex trafficking organizations; online networks and enterprises manufacturing, trading, distributing, and/or selling child *advertiser censored*
Contact offenses against children—domestic travel with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity with children; child sex tourism (international travel to engage in sexual activity with children); production of child *advertiser censored*, including “sextortion” involving children who are extorted into producing child *advertiser censored*; and coercion/enticement of a minor
Trafficking of child *advertiser censored*—distribution of child *advertiser censored*; possession of child *advertiser censored*.”

——

Crimes against children / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL

“Crimes against children

Crimes against children tend to be local crimes with the vast majority taking place within the home or family circle. There are, however, a number of areas where there is an international angle:
Internet crimes: crimes against children are facilitated by the Internet, the increased use of which in recent years has led to a huge rise in offending. Not only can offenders distribute and access child abuse material more easily, but they can also come into direct contact with children – via chatrooms and social networking sites. We run a project in conjunction with Internet Access Service Providers to block access to child abuse material online. “

Access blocking / Crimes against children / Crime areas / Internet / Home - INTERPOL

“The "Worst of"-list
INTERPOL has taken responsibility for providing a list of domains containing child sexual abuse content to any (Internet) Access Service Provider (ASP) willing to participate in reducing the availability of such material on the Web.
INTERPOL's "Worst of"-list includes those domains that contain the most severe child sexual abuse material, according to defined criteria.“

——

Child Exploitation Investigations Unit

“As part of ICE’s Cyber Crimes Center (C3), the CEIU uses cutting edge investigative techniques to bring justice to consumers, producers and distributors of child *advertiser censored*, as well as to predators engaging in child sex tourism. The efforts of the CEIU, in addition to ICE’s participation in national programs like Operation Predator and international partnerships like the Virtual Global Taskforce, have resulted in the rescue of thousands of children.“

———

US DOJ
Report a Crime

Child *advertiser censored* and/or sexual exploitation of children
Call your local FBI field office or Legal Attache' Office
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
800-THE-LOST (800-843-5678)
For more information see the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

—-

Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA)

“The FBI’s Child *advertiser censored* Victim Assistance (CPVA) program serves as the central repository for information on identified victims of child *advertiser censored*. Pursuant to federal statutes, law enforcement may be required to notify victims each time images of their victimization are seized as part of an investigation. The amount and frequency of notifications can be overwhelming, especially as victims may have difficulty coping with the impact of the crime and its ongoing aftermath.

To help streamline the notification process, CPVA attempts to minimize any additional trauma by limiting unnecessary contact with victims through utilization of the centralized and automated DOJ Victim Notification System. Through this system, CPVA continues to ensure victims are advised of the rights and services they may be entitled to as a result of any federal cases opened against offenders found in possession of their images, regardless of how much time has passed since the original exploitation took place.

CPVA is a joint initiative and coordinates directly with law enforcement or victim/witness personnel at various federal agencies, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.“

—-

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Home

—-

Feds take down “world’s largest dark web” child *advertiser censored* marketplace”


Feds take down the world's 'largest dark web child *advertiser censored* marketplace'



"The scale of this crime is eye-popping and sickening," John D. Fort, chief of IRS criminal investigations, said.

The site allegedly rewarded its members with "points" in relation to the amount of illegal material they uploaded, authorities announced Wednesday.

One user of the site, a former federal U.S. law enforcement agent, even downloaded more than 50 hours worth of videos

Child *advertiser censored* Is Out of Control: 45 Million Images Exist Online And Things Are Getting Worse
September 30, 2019

Continued sharing of child *advertiser censored* images 'worse than actual abuse'
Exploitation of kids online grows 'exponentially'
Sep 24, 2019

The Internet Is Overrun With Images of Child Sexual Abuse. What Went Wrong?
Sept. 28, 2019

“Last year tech companies reported over 45 million online photos and videos of children being sexually abused, more than double what they found the previous year.”
 
I am very interested in what evidence was obtained. And if his parents or family had any clue about this, maybe the pregnancy was actually planned, to make garner sympathy or reduce sentence.

DHS raided his worksite, November, 2019. Josh probably had an attorney, and told him what was going to be found. They have had plenty of time to craft a defense and make plans.
 
Thanks for this informative post.
In some other cases here at WS, the same has happened where an innocent partner was blindsided because they were isolated.

And it's sad to think that some women have no means (higher education than HS or a skill gained from work experiences) -- to break away and still be able to support their family.
One can imagine the pressure Josh's wife would be under from her in-laws.

But I think her own family would try to help her --I wish she'd take them up on any support/advice/offers of housing ?
Just saying, and Imo.
She does not and should not have to support her family by herself. Her husband has equal responsibility to support the children he fathered and it could be argued that his parents are liable too, for their part in this unnatural environment.
And as for that nonsense that a doctor told them that she had an abortion because she took a contraceptive is a just that. Nonsense.
 
What disturbs me the most, is if DHS had this evidence since November, 2019, and just let it "slide" until now? WTH?!

He has been with children in his home every single day since then...but now that he is formally "charged" it is an issue?!

That is messed up. Just saying .
I'm thinking the delay is because this is only the tip of the iceberg, and a whole ocean of charges is coming. Speculation: maybe other people are involved? "Bigger fish?" A massive criminal enterprise? IMO we don't know enough, but I think we can't assume this comprises the whole case.
Nonetheless, the idea that children were left to be victimized all this long while... Do we know if Children's Services weren't actually involved with the family for years?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
259
Total visitors
411

Forum statistics

Threads
609,221
Messages
18,251,142
Members
234,579
Latest member
GiGi10
Back
Top