enw10110
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2017
- Messages
- 583
- Reaction score
- 4,744
Ok, I was about 50 pages behind and here are my thoughts:
(THIS IS ALL IMO)
1. The dog thing on the last thread: That's changed my mind yet again about what happened. It sounds to me like the lack of comment by LE and the fact that they haven't been in a hurry from the beginning (not asking for public to help search, not giving info so they could get actual tips, etc), means they had a cadaver dog come in and it hit on something. They were "unsuccessful" because the cadaver dog didn't find Lucas. It actually makes a lot of sense. How did they know he wasn't abducted or didn't walk away? Because they knew he was dead. That means we're looking at her leaving him somewhere in a radius of their house. I realize a lot of you were already working off of that assumption, but I was thinking it may have happened somewhere else, which would change where she would leave his body.
2. EG never claimed Lucas walked away. She said the door was open and his shoes and coat were still there. Any 5-year-old would put on their shoes to go outside in February in the Midwest. She's also started showing us which way she's going with her story with the whole "smoking couple" nonsense. She's claimed abduction from the beginning. Therefore, I'm not sure the ideas that he's super close to home to make it look like he walked away are the right direction (I could obviously be wrong... I have no idea).
3. After reading ESO's post, I'm now leaning toward the "sickness" being internal injuries (maybe a ruptured spleen?). That also makes a lot of sense. That's why he was standing there with his little hands in his pockets... he was in pain. That's why she tried to get him to play instead of letting him rest in bed. That's could also very likely be what killed him. That's why she didn't mention his "illness" in the interview. That's why she couldn't just say he died of the flu and get charged with neglect instead of murder. The timing of the "illness" and the "disappearance" are just too coincidental. That also leads me to believe that maybe she DID act alone.... maybe.
4. I definitely don't think closing the tip line means they have all the info they need. I would think even if they knew where he was and they had recovered his body, they'd still want tips to continue to build their case.
5. JH... his comments made me physically ill. BUT, you have to remember that JH and EG have a history of domestic violence. They're allegedly both violent towards each other and the children (maybe different children, but still). They're super co-dependent at this point. He also might be in denial, knowing that if she IS guilty, he's the one that left Lucas with her. There is blame there, and he knows it... and he doesn't want it. I would be absolutely shocked if he was just acting to try and get her to tell him something. That's super wishful thinking, but you have to look at who we're talking about here. He literally sat there during his interview, looked the reporter in the eye, and said that he had NO indication that something like this could happen. And now he's playing the "you just don't know!" card. My pre-teen does the same thing. It's that belief that you're so different from everyone else. Your relationship is SO different. Your situation is soooo different. No one could possibly understand you. When in reality your "missing child" situation is pretty much exactly the same as every other missing child situation.
There it is... my 2 cents about the last 50ish pages. Again, all JMO.
(THIS IS ALL IMO)
1. The dog thing on the last thread: That's changed my mind yet again about what happened. It sounds to me like the lack of comment by LE and the fact that they haven't been in a hurry from the beginning (not asking for public to help search, not giving info so they could get actual tips, etc), means they had a cadaver dog come in and it hit on something. They were "unsuccessful" because the cadaver dog didn't find Lucas. It actually makes a lot of sense. How did they know he wasn't abducted or didn't walk away? Because they knew he was dead. That means we're looking at her leaving him somewhere in a radius of their house. I realize a lot of you were already working off of that assumption, but I was thinking it may have happened somewhere else, which would change where she would leave his body.
2. EG never claimed Lucas walked away. She said the door was open and his shoes and coat were still there. Any 5-year-old would put on their shoes to go outside in February in the Midwest. She's also started showing us which way she's going with her story with the whole "smoking couple" nonsense. She's claimed abduction from the beginning. Therefore, I'm not sure the ideas that he's super close to home to make it look like he walked away are the right direction (I could obviously be wrong... I have no idea).
3. After reading ESO's post, I'm now leaning toward the "sickness" being internal injuries (maybe a ruptured spleen?). That also makes a lot of sense. That's why he was standing there with his little hands in his pockets... he was in pain. That's why she tried to get him to play instead of letting him rest in bed. That's could also very likely be what killed him. That's why she didn't mention his "illness" in the interview. That's why she couldn't just say he died of the flu and get charged with neglect instead of murder. The timing of the "illness" and the "disappearance" are just too coincidental. That also leads me to believe that maybe she DID act alone.... maybe.
4. I definitely don't think closing the tip line means they have all the info they need. I would think even if they knew where he was and they had recovered his body, they'd still want tips to continue to build their case.
5. JH... his comments made me physically ill. BUT, you have to remember that JH and EG have a history of domestic violence. They're allegedly both violent towards each other and the children (maybe different children, but still). They're super co-dependent at this point. He also might be in denial, knowing that if she IS guilty, he's the one that left Lucas with her. There is blame there, and he knows it... and he doesn't want it. I would be absolutely shocked if he was just acting to try and get her to tell him something. That's super wishful thinking, but you have to look at who we're talking about here. He literally sat there during his interview, looked the reporter in the eye, and said that he had NO indication that something like this could happen. And now he's playing the "you just don't know!" card. My pre-teen does the same thing. It's that belief that you're so different from everyone else. Your relationship is SO different. Your situation is soooo different. No one could possibly understand you. When in reality your "missing child" situation is pretty much exactly the same as every other missing child situation.
There it is... my 2 cents about the last 50ish pages. Again, all JMO.