Henry2326
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2017
- Messages
- 10,785
- Reaction score
- 74,769
We know he was not with her. confirmed this afternoon.
Sent from my P00I using Tapatalk
We know he was not with her. confirmed this afternoon.
I'm probably way behind but, it's entirely possible this is the "new info" LE had to share with TEQ, and we don't know where they're searching - they're keeping that from the public (last I heard).
We know he was not with her. confirmed this afternoon.
Sent from my P00I using Tapatalk
Yes, but you have to be friends with them to see if theyve checked in or posted pics with the tag. I just tried. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rmt- do you have the TES # available? The one you use if you were able to search?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would like to know what she ordered at OG.
Alcohol?
Any food to-go? Like...for Lucas?
and did she go anywhere else! this is so frustrating
I think EG had help & that help came within the hour or so she was at OG. IMO, she showed all her cards with that "alibi" = or at least she thinks she did. I think LE suspects LH didn't disappear on the 17th. I think she thinks she's getting away with it. I think her help is someone that stands to lose as much as she does (drug dealer, druggie friend, married lover, etc.) Again, all MOO. I just pray Lucas is found soon.
On another note, if I was their landlord, no way in h-e-double hockey sticks would these people (EG/JH) continue to live in my rental. Unless asked to hold of by LE for whatever reason, they'd have been out yesterday.
I don't know about Kansas, but in Oregon a landlord can legally give a 72 hour eviction notice to all the unit's tenants when one or more tenants in the home have been charged with certain crimes... not convicted, mind you, charged. So if your husband gets arrested for burglary, for example, in Oregon the landlord can legally give the entire family 72 hours to get out.The owner would be required to give them a one month eviction notice.
They literally have to fill the gap between the 11th when Lucas was seen by the neighbor all the way to the 17th when EG reported him missing. Obviously, he wasn't with her on the 16th for part of the day - so that leaves a really big question mark and opens the possibility of longer distances traveled to hide little Lucas.And going off that train of thought, is it possible LE don't believe the timeline given and that's why they looked at phone activity the day before she reported Lucas missing? If I had to guess, I'd guess they looked at activity for several days before the missing report.
They literally have to fill the gap between the 11th when Lucas was seen by the neighbor all the way to the 17th when EG reported him missing. Obviously, he wasn't with her on the 16th for part of the day - so that leaves a really big question mark and opens the possibility of longer distances traveled to hide little Lucas.
The owner would be required to give them a one month eviction notice.
'For some reason I think EG went to OG because she wanted to be seen. Im still trying to work this out.
If she just wanted a quick bite to eat with her daughter, why not McDonalds? However, she likely wouldnt be noticed there. OG is more of a sit down place where you you take your time and enjoy conversation. A woman alone with a small child would be noticed by staff and other patrons. Gift card aside, I think she went there deliberately and made a point of using her phone, but I cant figure out why. JMO