keeleydoll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,370
- Reaction score
- 2,616
But it has also been stated that dad is only home for 30 days, and gone for 90 (can't remember where I saw that, somewhere in this thread, I believe stated by our VI)... and if that's the case, I'm sure EG could have told him stories "He fell off his bike, he was running outside and tripped... etc."
The problem is, we don't know.
Lucas may have never spoken the truth to dad, even if questioned, for fear of what EG might do to him when dad left again.
I think until we have PROOF that dad KNEW what was going on, we should treat him as a victim, and as a father who doesn't know where his child is.
While it might be easy to say "Oh, he KNEW"... we don't know that he did.
Just my opinion.
My experience and options only.
If she was willing to swing on a grown man shed have no compunction about hitting or kicking a child. There are photographs of him with awful bruises that couldnt logically be explained away by playground, bike, other child, whatever injuries. Ive seen kids who have face planted on a bike and theres always road rash with the bruising. Ive seen kids accidentally head butted by other kids on the playground with facial bruising. It looks completely different than being hit in the face. One of mine ran out onto the playground one day at preschool smack into a plasticised picnic table and hit with her eye and brow, she bled like a stuck pig and needed a bunch of stitches but even after that the bruising certainly didnt look like that in the pics of Lucas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk