oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,712
I honestly dont understand , and find it rather ironic when some say that other posters seem to want Savannah to be a murder victim, but then turn around, and prematurely assume somehow it was an accidental overdose.
Imo, the circumstances surrounding Savannah's disappearance, and subsequently found dead, and bound... certainly points far more to foul play than an accident.
Like I posted previously due to the first months of frigid cold weather it may have helped to slow the decomposition stages. Imo, the ME will learn much from Savannah's body including if she was bound before or near death. If it was afterwards then there wouldn't be any underlying bruising to the tissue.
And really why would it be necessary to bind Savannah after dead who was a small petite woman? He easily could remove her body right by himself without any binding.
Can anyone show me any accidental death where the body was found bound inside a grave or bound no matter where the body was found? TIA
Just using common sense, and logic the way the victim was found leans far more to foul play being involved than it does accidental.
Also, imo, the investigators already by now know the blood found in a closet was not blood from having twins. Labs are able to discern the difference. They will present all of their evidence to the GJ, and will not do so publicly for there is no need to do so since the public being informed is irrelevant.
Why was it found in his closet of all places anyway or anywhere close?
None of Savannah's blood should have been found anywhere in his home, but it's even more alarming it wasn't found on a bathroom toilet seat, but instead his closet.
Why would Savannah willingly be inside his closet bleeding? Imo, she wasn't willingly inside of his home at that point. How far up was the blood found? Was it blood spatter perhaps he failed to cleanup? Specific location of any blood found belonging to the victim is of vital importance, and forensically revealing.
In many states only a GJ can indict on the top charge of first degree murder. This state may be the same.IDRK. Imo, this is going to windup with him being charged with murder. This was no accident, and even with the little we know now points to foul play.
Will the DT blame, and victim bash the murder victim? Absolutely, that has become common place unfortunately in many cases.
What is not common place thankfully are jurors buying the toxic koolaid the DT wants them to drink.
What it winds up doing when DTs victim blame is highly insult the intelligence of the jurors who are perfectly capable of looking at all the evidence themselves, and it ticks them off that the DT dared to blame the victim trying to get their murdering client off wanting them to walk free again.
So if he is charged with murder I hope the DT does use this same mistake strategy often used.
CE cases are the easiest to follow, and imo, the evidence amassed by trial time will be overwhelming against him no matter how much the DT tries to blame the victim for their own death.
Most all jurors are reasonable minded people, and recognize more than ever before the deceptive games DTs play.
In the end Savannah, and her loving shattered family will receive justice for her murder. Imo.
Jmho
Imo, the circumstances surrounding Savannah's disappearance, and subsequently found dead, and bound... certainly points far more to foul play than an accident.
Like I posted previously due to the first months of frigid cold weather it may have helped to slow the decomposition stages. Imo, the ME will learn much from Savannah's body including if she was bound before or near death. If it was afterwards then there wouldn't be any underlying bruising to the tissue.
And really why would it be necessary to bind Savannah after dead who was a small petite woman? He easily could remove her body right by himself without any binding.
Can anyone show me any accidental death where the body was found bound inside a grave or bound no matter where the body was found? TIA
Just using common sense, and logic the way the victim was found leans far more to foul play being involved than it does accidental.
Also, imo, the investigators already by now know the blood found in a closet was not blood from having twins. Labs are able to discern the difference. They will present all of their evidence to the GJ, and will not do so publicly for there is no need to do so since the public being informed is irrelevant.
Why was it found in his closet of all places anyway or anywhere close?
None of Savannah's blood should have been found anywhere in his home, but it's even more alarming it wasn't found on a bathroom toilet seat, but instead his closet.
Why would Savannah willingly be inside his closet bleeding? Imo, she wasn't willingly inside of his home at that point. How far up was the blood found? Was it blood spatter perhaps he failed to cleanup? Specific location of any blood found belonging to the victim is of vital importance, and forensically revealing.
In many states only a GJ can indict on the top charge of first degree murder. This state may be the same.IDRK. Imo, this is going to windup with him being charged with murder. This was no accident, and even with the little we know now points to foul play.
Will the DT blame, and victim bash the murder victim? Absolutely, that has become common place unfortunately in many cases.
What is not common place thankfully are jurors buying the toxic koolaid the DT wants them to drink.
What it winds up doing when DTs victim blame is highly insult the intelligence of the jurors who are perfectly capable of looking at all the evidence themselves, and it ticks them off that the DT dared to blame the victim trying to get their murdering client off wanting them to walk free again.
So if he is charged with murder I hope the DT does use this same mistake strategy often used.
CE cases are the easiest to follow, and imo, the evidence amassed by trial time will be overwhelming against him no matter how much the DT tries to blame the victim for their own death.
Most all jurors are reasonable minded people, and recognize more than ever before the deceptive games DTs play.
In the end Savannah, and her loving shattered family will receive justice for her murder. Imo.
Jmho
Last edited: