I'm the one that posted that the white truck on St Landry looked dirty and the one on W University didn't. However, the ones on St Landry were full of glare and the pixels were blown out so the 'dirt' could just be artifacts of the camera.
Tank you. I looked and looked and it looks like dirt or dents(in the pic where you see the passenger side). I started to think that maybe that corner of the truck was wrecked and that the figure everyone saw and thought looked like a person when it was going in the opposite direction(towards the light) was the inside of the messed up wrecked corner.
In any case, I am thinking that the police saw actual videos in which you could see more detail of any and everything as it passed under street light.
I think that the reason why those two pictures of the same truck were put out there like that is because it is suspicious that it went down a street turned aroundand came up same street. I'd like to know what direction the truck came from before it turned?
Also, I want to make sure I get this right.(not good with street names)
1.Mickey turns onto street
2.truck turns down same street(1:48)
(Here is where I get mixed up)
3. Which one is comes next? Or does it matter?
......Mickey should show up on next camera and doesn't
Or......same truck comes back opposite direction coming up to light
And then the other two are stamped with times
4.land yacht (1:49)
5.other truck (1:51)
And I'd also like to know if anyone else thinks that le might intentionally obscure or blur parts of photos such as these which may explain why we all see or think we see certain things.like the crosswalk sign that certainly does resemble a person on a bike.. and also in the picture of the land yacht in front of the apartments I can vaguely see something that looks like a bike at least to my over imaginative eyes.