folieadeuxnola
70's-80's Jane Doe's
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2013
- Messages
- 5,108
- Reaction score
- 6,230
:bump:
:christmastree:
The search is not over and your not forgotten young lady one day you will no longer carry the name of Jane Doe.
Striking resemblance, however the MP went missing in the Laredo area, she has no DNA
![]()
![]()
Date Of Birth: June 24, 1960
Age at Time of Disappearance: 25 years old
Height and Weight at Time of Disappearance: 5'4; 110 lbs
Distinguishing Characteristics: Hispanic female. Black hair; brown eyes.
Clothing: She was wearing a gray and purple body shirt, blue jeans and sandals.
AKA: Gloria Ann Gongora
In researching news article there was a woman whom went missing a few weeks prior unsure if she was ever located or not.
Posted as many articles as I could find, unsure if they are all that legible was doing some copy cut and paste. Carl had posted a possiblity she could be Sandra Faye Norman - FL, she has no DNA
Date Of Birth: February 13, 1958
Age at Time of Disappearance: 25 years old
Height and Weight at Time of Disappearance: 5'3"; 100 lbs.
Distinguishing Characteristics: Straight, thick blackish brown hair; brown eyes. Very slender frame. Was a smoker.
Dentals: Had good teeth.
AKA: Her married name is Thompson
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1259dffl.html
Just a little update!
I received an email from the case manager in regards to Sandra Norman.
Email:
I spoke with the agency where Sandra was reported missing. There are no dental records available and her family is refusing to give DNA. We cannot do a comparison without one of those. I am making a file note to look into this later if the situation ever changes. However, I think Sandra is more similar to our case 85-01 than she is to 03-35.
Helen
Wonder why Sandra's family refuses DNA testing? I guess there isn't anything else we can do in regards to Sandra being a possible match....
Interesting that Sandra is on their radar for case 85-01. She came up on my radar just a few days ago with regard to the same case. I remembered that she was already being considered for Lake Ponchartrain Jane Doe and figured that it must be something about the artist's style that pegs Sandra Norman to these LSU Faces Lab recons.
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/191ufla.html
BTW, DoeNet has the case number incorrectly noted as 85-10.
With some families, they don't want to think anything other than that their loved one will come home alive some day. It's almost as if they feel like they are betraying their promise to never give up on them.
As noted by the comments, LSU sees a potential with Sandra and BRJD 85-01
Carl makes a valid point in regards to reconstructions it depends on the artists style. In which if you look at the sketch and reconstructions they look very different. Maybe one day Carl will create a reconstruct on LPJD thus far out of all of the UID's have read about his eyes and reconstructs are the best ... Near life like ....
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk