I read on a group the coroner has not listed her as deceased.
See Billandrews post #556 <modsnip>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read on a group the coroner has not listed her as deceased.
Interesting read thanks. I wonder if the fact that DM and MS were charged with another death helped them presume LB is dead.
Oh I believe she is dead I just wondered even if we think there is a 99% chance someone is dead do we just close the file on them or do we at least leave a smallest of windows just in case.
Goes along well with Walt DisneyWell, it is a pre-school show, so, right audience.
Do you have a link for this please?I read on a group the coroner has not listed her as deceased.
But...how is that relevant to the case or our business?I was surprised that the Crown didn't push on that point. For all we know, she could be making hundreds per hour and billing many hours for minimal work.
They wouldn't be tried for a murder if she wasn't believed dead. Check this out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declared_death_in_absentia
How much would you be willing to bet that she's alive?
And Canada isn't on the list as is usual.
There is a calling for a lawyer or university Prof.
In his re-examination, Millard attempted to undo some of the damage. This is where he got in trouble with Justice Michael Code, who cautioned that re-examination could not delve into areas which hadn’t been raised in direct examination of his own witness or emerged in the cross.“You’re repeating your questions, now stop it,” Code told Millard, sharply. “That’s an order.”
Millard: “Shall we break momentarily?”
Code: “No, we shan’t.”
Millard: “If there’s concern that my question is inappropriate, do you want to excuse the jury while we discuss it?”
Code: “No.”
In front of the jury — and of course they have no knowledge what occurs in the courtroom in their absence — Code has gone to extreme lengths of patience through the thrust-and-parry process, at several junctures instructing the defendant to the point of practically putting questions to properly ask in Millard’s mouth.
“Your Honour, I apologize,” said Millard. “This is the first time I’m doing this.”
But...how is that relevant to the case or our business?
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Source: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/sta...wears-thin-at-laura-babcock-murder-trial.html
I think we all expected this to eventually occur, yet, still a big smile when it finally happened.
DM picked the perfect time to display his grandiosity, arrogance & narcissism, with the Jury observing (perfect), and directly against the Judge!! (of all people).
He is a psychopath. Standing in front of LB parents, with pics of LB's bones in his incinerator, now trying to over-rule the judge.
If any jurors had any doubts lingering about DM having a God complex, these would be removed today.
She admitted for working for the company, but her remuneration amount is irrelevant, IMHO.because her testimony may be affected by her fear of repercussions - I.e. Job loss - if she said anything negative. MOO
She admitted for working for the company, but her remuneration amount is irrelevant, IMHO.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
The first couple would show that he was a man of diversified interests and talents- a rich playboy achiever. His Real Estate agent would testify that he was sleeping with her at this time as well; neighbouring farmer and hunters to testify that there are lots of deer in the area; his tenants that MS lived in the building and may not have been very dependable and bank tellers to tell us that DM had lots of money. MOORBBM. Just out of curiosity, what would any of these witnesses have to offer DM's defence?
because her testimony may be affected by her fear of repercussions - I.e. Job loss - if she said anything negative. MOO
Really? I've thought I've seen my sister at the mall and it wasn't her.
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
If I were Babcock's parents I would be so mad at this guy. Even though it is likely he never did see her, the fact that he admitted to ignoring the missing person reports is a pretty awful.
Interesting. I don't know what any of that would do to prove he didn't murder LB, though. I also find it hard to believe that he could find someone who would blatantly lie for him on the stand (re. deer at the farm).The first couple would show that he was a man of diversified interests and talents- a rich playboy achiever. His Real Estate agent would testify that he was sleeping with her at this time as well; neighbouring farmer and hunters to testify that there are lots of deer in the area; his tenants that MS lived in the building and may not have been very dependable and bank tellers to tell us that DM had lots of money. MOO