Letters to Casey from Cindy and George

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Wow - some interesting questions. What is CA afraid of? IMO that ICA will be found not guilty and she will be coming home.
Why doesn't ICA tell CA the gory details? She's not smart but she's wily - any chance it could fall into evidence or have her mother waving it around isn't something she'd be willing to risk.

Because she knows as soon as she does tht, KC will cut her off. She has also been told (pretty sure it was Lee) that the best way is to not be threatening - he talks about this in his deposition with Morgan.

But if you read Cindy's earlier letters, she most definitely puts the guilts on KC and talks about Caylee and how much Caylee LOVED her mother, etc., etc. and how she is in heaven, etc.

If I can see this is trying to get KC to open up, I know that KC saw it. It was blatently obvious that it was what Cindy was doing.
 
Because she knows as soon as she does tht, KC will cut her off. She has also been told (pretty sure it was Lee) that the best way is to not be threatening - he talks about this in his deposition with Morgan.

But if you read Cindy's earlier letters, she most definitely puts the guilts on KC and talks about Caylee and how much Caylee LOVED her mother, etc., etc. and how she is in heaven, etc.

If I can see this is trying to get KC to open up, I know that KC saw it. It was blatently obvious that it was what Cindy was doing.

It looks to me like ICA has already cut her off, except for occasions when ICA needs to make the connection. What I'm curious to know is if ICA even answers these letters? Baez can't be the conduit because it looks like he doesn't visit often enough.

And yes, I agree in the early days CA was being all sweet in her conversation, knowing if she went after ICA head on she would be met by yet another temper tantrum. And despite all the overwhelming evidence there may have been a shred of hope that ICA had stashed a live Caylee somewhere and ICA hadn't actually murdered her after all.
 
He did tell LE and if he used that on his employment application and it was a lie they could have fired him. I know years ago LE preferred candidates with some type of formal education and not just a high school certificate. But then we are talking about the A's. If he were going to lie though why would he put his major as business adm and ART??? lol Art being on the other end of law enforcement studies. jmo

I worked for many years at IBM. Often I saw them hire marketing reps whose major had absolutely nothing at all to do with the position for which they were being hired. One in particular I remember was a music major. Had absolutely nothing at all to do with selling computers.

Having said that, maybe it's possible that George knew that what his degree was in was not as important as the fact that he had pne. Maybe he felt like if he put a degree that related to the job he was applying for, they would expect him to come in knowing things he KNEW he didn't know. The knowledge he would have with a business admin and/or art major wouldn't be used at that particular job, so he could probably skate by.

Geeze, I hope that all makes sense. I know what I am trying to convey, but I'm not sure I am saying it right.

I, along with several others, am of the opinion that Shirley P. would know if GA had a degree. And I would be much more prone to believe SP rather than anything that comes out of GA's mouth. Embellishing themselves to make them appear better than they really are is a typical Anthony "mis-statement".
 
Regarding GA's reference to his college degree for the LE position ....

This is Bucks County, PA's education requirement for Police Officer position - just found one agency's posting for an example:


Graduation from a high school or possession of a GED certificate. Upon hire, uncertified applicants will be required to successfully complete Pennsylvania Act 120 training to receive certification as a Police Officer. After hire, applicants must continue to meet current Municipal Police Officer Education & Training Commission standards as required.

Interesting to me that there's no standard statement about "college degree a plus" or something to that effect.
 
BBM You are correct LC, that is if they cared enough to verify it. I worked with a woman who claimed to be a PhD years ago. It wasn't until management suspected she might have misrepresented her education that it was investigated and proven to be false.

But security companies have to be bonded and that means they have to do a thorough background check. If they carry a gun it's even more so. Plus if you are going to lie about it why put it in writing that it took you 5 1/2 years to graduate because you had to pay your own way. This is someone who actually worked hard to get their education. I really think he is being honest. He can be at times, like the Grand Jury. jmo
 
Regarding GA's reference to his college degree for the LE position ....

This is Bucks County, PA's education requirement for Police Officer position - just found one agency's posting for an example:


Graduation from a high school or possession of a GED certificate. Upon hire, uncertified applicants will be required to successfully complete Pennsylvania Act 120 training to receive certification as a Police Officer. After hire, applicants must continue to meet current Municipal Police Officer Education & Training Commission standards as required.

Interesting to me that there's no standard statement about "college degree a plus" or something to that effect.

Years ago the educational standards were higher, back when GA would have been hired. Some time in the 70's they had to lower the educational requirements because the inner city needed more police officers to meet their quotas. At the time there were not a lot of inner city young men who could afford to go to college but were good candidates for police officers because they joined the police cadet programs. After that college was preferred but not pushed. But back when GA joined college was a plus when joining a force.
 
Regarding GA's reference to his college degree for the LE position ....

This is Bucks County, PA's education requirement for Police Officer position - just found one agency's posting for an example:


Graduation from a high school or possession of a GED certificate. Upon hire, uncertified applicants will be required to successfully complete Pennsylvania Act 120 training to receive certification as a Police Officer. After hire, applicants must continue to meet current Municipal Police Officer Education & Training Commission standards as required.

Interesting to me that there's no standard statement about "college degree a plus" or something to that effect.

My son is looking into applying/testing to become an officer and having a college degree will get you "bonus" points on the test.
 
Regarding GA's reference to his college degree for the LE position ....

This is Bucks County, PA's education requirement for Police Officer position - just found one agency's posting for an example:


Graduation from a high school or possession of a GED certificate. Upon hire, uncertified applicants will be required to successfully complete Pennsylvania Act 120 training to receive certification as a Police Officer. After hire, applicants must continue to meet current Municipal Police Officer Education & Training Commission standards as required.

Interesting to me that there's no standard statement about "college degree a plus" or something to that effect.


BBM: From personal experience...every Police Department is different. Some require just a HS Diploma and some require 60 credits. Each State has a minimum requirement, but nothing the same "across the board".
 
But security companies have to be bonded and that means they have to do a thorough background check. If they carry a gun it's even more so. Plus if you are going to lie about it why put it in writing that it took you 5 1/2 years to graduate because you had to pay your own way. This is someone who actually worked hard to get their education. I really think he is being honest. He can be at times, like the Grand Jury. jmo

An applicant's college degree would probably not be verified for a security officer position. It's too costly for companies to check any more than what's required by the State for licensing. State licensing requirements vary. Most security companies require the applicant be at least 18 yrs old, have a HS diploma or GED and no felony convictions. That's all it takes. Gun permits for security officers are a whole different story, with more thorough background checks and personality/psych tests, but IIRC George didn't have a carry permit. This is just MO from experience in the security industry.

I'm not saying he's lying, I'm just sayin'...
 
An applicant's college degree would probably not be verified for a security officer position. It's too costly for companies to check any more than what's required by the State for licensing. State licensing requirements vary. Most security companies require the applicant be at least 18 yrs old, have a HS diploma or GED and no felony convictions. That's all it takes. Gun permits for security officers are a whole different story, with more thorough background checks and personality/psych tests, but IIRC George didn't have a carry permit. This is just MO from experience in the security industry.

I'm not saying he's lying, I'm just sayin'...

GA does have a handgun so I would assume he has a gun permit. Security companies have to be bonded and in doing so most of them have some strick background checking rules. FYI, background checks are not that expensive. My husband used companies to get background information all the time. Banks who hire security companies want their employees checked and other bigger companies as well want a security officer who is responsible. So bigger security companies do do them. Also in order to find out if someone has no felony convictions....you have to do a background check. jmo
 
And, unfortunately, if this were to happen, she would die having been acquitted of murdered... therefore, a free woman... she would become a martyr. Cindy would make sure of it.

If KC is going to die, it needs to be through the legal process having been convicted of murdering her innocent daughter and sentenced to die through whichever method she chooses.

That is so much more than she deserves... but it is the way it needs to be.

:twocents:

Oh I completely agree with you on all points. I don't think there's any chance in heck that KC is walking away from the court room, arm in arm with Foghorn Leghorn mason, as a free woman. I would like for KC to die for her horrific crimes by the State and think that's how it should be done too, despite it being too good for her..considering what she did to Caylee.
I was just making it known that she wouldn't make it far enough to go out shopping at Target again, or going out to clubs, whatever...

It's not something I worry about though. She will not be acquitted and I am confident she will never leave prison except for in a wooden box. At this last hearing I'm starting to wonder if she's coming to that realization. I sure hope so, but part of me thinks she was upset about something trivial. Like an itchy jail issued pair of underwear, stomach pains from too many spicy slim jims, or having to look at CA's awful he-man hair..etc. Who knows what goes on in that crazy girls mind.

ETA: Sorry my conversation is O/T from what others are talking about atm. I don't want to change the discussion. It just took me 2 days to realize Snaz replied to me! :banghead: Sorry!
 
We've got two new letters to discuss! (and darn you 'Beach for posting them faster than me, lol)

The October one mentions Casey's grandma going to a kids engagement party. I wonder if that party for was Lee and Mallory? I guess she really is going to be part of that family, God help her.

Yep, she mentions it in the Sept. letter too - what day the engagement happened and that there's no plans until next fall. So Lee and Mallory are getting hitched!
 
IMO parts of these letters are directed to the media and public. I can't believe she still believes KC is coming home and thinks JB is doing a good job. Unbelievable!
 
What cracks me up is that Cindy uses the word "chilaxing" (which I am not sure is an actual word) in the Sept. letter. Yeah, that made you sound so hip and cool, Cindy! LOL
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
171
Guests online
312
Total visitors
483

Forum statistics

Threads
609,370
Messages
18,253,274
Members
234,640
Latest member
AnnaWV
Back
Top