UKGuy,
What is the likelihood BR dna is going to be on the top & bottom, inside and outside via cross-transfer of the nightgown?
And then wet the bed, so she was changed into the nightgown?
BR had his friends over Christmas Day. Those coke cans could have belonged to them. I doubt PR was going to pick them up any more then the soiled pj bottoms left in JB bathroom.
Just out of curiosity, do you base your stead fast idea that the soiled pajamas bottoms (thought to be to big for JB; said to be found on her bedroom floor) solely on FF?
Where did those dark fibers come from all over her shirt?
Maybe JAR wanted the same one for the same reason?
Rain on my Parade,
What is the likelihood BR dna is going to be on the top & bottom, inside and outside via cross-transfer of the nightgown?
It might be high, it might be low, even with the washing machine as a source for the nightgown it does not reduce to zero.
More relevant is that the nightgown should
not be in the wine-cellar.
And then wet the bed, so she was changed into the nightgown?
Possibly.
Just out of curiosity, do you base your stead fast idea that the soiled pajamas bottoms (thought to be to big for JB; said to be found on her bedroom floor) solely on FF?
Not entirely. I assume the observation of the soiled pajama bottoms is independent of James Kolar's speculation. Kolar cited a CSI report in his book as his source, which will have been signed off and entered into the documentary evidence.
Another witness to JonBenet's bedroom was Holly Smith, she was head of the Boulder County Sexual Abuse team and had been called into the investigation on the third day.
She found something else in the room, however, which raised an immediate red flag. Smith says most of the panties in JonBenet’s dresser drawers had been
soiled with fecal material.
One poignant find that she does recall was a
red satin box with what looked like JonBenet’s
secret stash of candy.
Holly Smith deliberately left out any reference to the Red Satin Box being fecally smeared, which must suggest it is forensically important, i.e. a cross-reference between the satin box and the pajama bottoms on the basis of a dna test?
Also Holly Smith may have read the CSI report and also observed the fecally soiled pajama bottoms on the bedroom floor, possibly prompting her to check JonBenet's underwear?
Holly Smith was removed from the case, and had all the material relating to the Ramsey's
redacted from her autobiography, effectively silencing her.
Where did those dark fibers come from all over her shirt?
Presumaby JR's woolen shirt, he did say he carried her to bed?
Maybe JAR wanted the same one for the same reason?
Could be, the important aspect of JR's black shirt is that it was woolen and manufactured in Israel. This made it easy to distinguish from USA manufactured woolen shirts. So any claim by BPD regarding the shirts fibers being found on JonBenet's groin region impacted on JR's claim of being asleep?
From the evidence it's possible that rather than a bedwetting incident taking place, defecation was the order of the day?
Consider there was a pair of JonBenet's pants containing fecally soiled underwear left lying on her bathroom floor.
This might represent childhood immaturity, lazyness, whatever or something more important forensically? i.e. match it with the
soiled pajamas bottoms?
If you follow the case you will notice a slow drip feed of previously sealed evidence, so I expect the CSI report that Kolar cited to be leaked eventually, probably as a prelude to a documentary headlining a new theory?
.
