Here's a blast from the past: After the Feds released 3000 pages of evidence to both sides in late February, the prosecutors claimed it supported their case.
The prosecution said it has reviewed all the evidence from the feds and Assistant D.A. Laura McLaughlin disputed the defense’s interpretation of it.
“I would say approximately 90% to 95% of the material that we’ve received is consistent with the Commonwealth’s theory of the case,” McLaughlin said in court. “The evidence, as a whole, is very consistent with prior statements made by witnesses.”
Judge delays Karen Read murder trial after thousands of pages of new federal evidence emerges
Prosecutors have alleged that Read backed over her boyfriend and left him to die in a blizzard in Canton.www.boston25news.com
I think we can now safely say that they were being disingenuous at best. Maybe it's true that 90% of the pages released were things the commonwealth already knew, but the remaining 10% were explosive. From Proctor's texts to the suspicious activity of Brian Higgins to the reports of the accident reconstruction experts, the Fed evidence has blown a giant hole in the case against Karen Read.
Don't forget, it was snowing!
Ryan Nagel mentioned the Feds in his testimony, so they already know.I’d take that bet
I’m not suggesting the jurors aren’t smart or informed, just that I wouldn’t expect them to assume a parallel FBI investigation.
I'm still looking for a link, that's not behind a paywall for me, saying Chloe was a former police dog.
They’ve frequently used the phrase “other proceeding where (we) were not there”. Used by both defense and CW.
And the only damage to his shirt was 9 small puncture wounds. Not compatible with tail light injuries at all.
Mainly curiosity. But maybe it would help some people visualize it better.
Yes, she was adopted from Texas. I've had GSD's and Malinois my whole adult life and they are always protective. It's in their DNA. They will jump at someone they feel is a threat but people always put out their dominant arm for protection and that's where the dog goes because they see that arm moving up for defense. We've owned several generations sadly, because dogs don't live long enough, roughly 15 years.
I took this to mean he wouldn’t get into those specifics today, not that he wouldn’t testify in front of the jury about their conclusions. I wasn’t paying close attention though. Was it said that he won’t be testifying as to the conclusions they arrived at?
Extremely convenient.
Ok, so let’s go with 90-95%… that 5-10% is what we call… REASONABLE DOUBT.Here's a blast from the past: After the Feds released 3000 pages of evidence to both sides in late February, the prosecutors claimed it supported their case.
The prosecution said it has reviewed all the evidence from the feds and Assistant D.A. Laura McLaughlin disputed the defense’s interpretation of it.
“I would say approximately 90% to 95% of the material that we’ve received is consistent with the Commonwealth’s theory of the case,” McLaughlin said in court. “The evidence, as a whole, is very consistent with prior statements made by witnesses.”
Judge delays Karen Read murder trial after thousands of pages of new federal evidence emerges
Prosecutors have alleged that Read backed over her boyfriend and left him to die in a blizzard in Canton.
I think we can now safely say that they were being disingenuous at best. Maybe it's true that 90% of the pages released were things the commonwealth already knew, but the remaining 10% were explosive. From Proctor's texts to the suspicious activity of Brian Higgins to the reports of the accident reconstruction experts, the Fed evidence has blown a giant hole in the case against Karen Read.
When someone respectfully asks you to stop .
