One is a photo and the one with lines is a capture from a video. Probably an interlaced video. Google interlaced video.
Wouldn’t the lines be all over then?
One is a photo and the one with lines is a capture from a video. Probably an interlaced video. Google interlaced video.
Could it be that they want more info, to charge him with several crimes at once?Well that is all fine but constitutionally I believe that the way the state announces high conviction in guilt is by charging someone.
Not by doing a media conference where they say he did it but don't charge him
If they are not going to charge, then the language of suspect or person of interest should be used
Otherwise we get into the situation where the state announces people guilty of significant crimes outside of the judicial process.
Wouldn’t the lines be all over then?
Wouldn’t the lines be all over then?
Could it be that they want more info, to charge him with several crimes at once?
yes, of course. i ignored any cropped imagery. and looked for the image that contained the most 'content' in each case.Its really easy to change the size of a photo in photoshop and a lot of editors of news media will so to suit their own needs. EG: you don't need a high resolution photo to post on the internet. It will be just fine at low resolution. But if you want to print, you need a higher resolution. You can change how many dpi appear in a photo with photoshop easily and repeatedly and save at various sizes to suit your needs. Its likely most media publishers have changed the specs to suit their own needs.
I'm glad others are seeing this large brown dog on the sofa too, Ah the whip....I did wonder what that was, I thought it looked like some garment orange garment with a zip lol.
Now at the side of the leather sofa on the floor I now think I can see a small dog similar in size & shape to the one seen in the photo of CB at the bar?
Yeah I would Defo say this is footage found on his drives, Yeah no doubt action including the beam, whip, exercise ball & perhaps that weird dolly thing. I just hope & pray that this footage they found doesn’t have MM in it.
These beams....I mean why would AB have one in his attic too?
There's no evidence picture was photoshoped. And I don't see a reason it should be.
Right, why should the pictures have been manipulated or altered?
IMO there are two possiblities!
First: Pictures taken from evidence found on his property.
Second: Pictures from the family he later sold the van to.
Maybe it's just about the car and someone to remember something?!
i agree. what that 1 pixel difference says to me is that the images have been scanned from physical prints at some point. they are not the original digital imagery, direct from the camera. the left edge of the malaga image you can see white continuing down over the wing mirror. you would not get this from an original digital file. you would get this from a scan of a print.Googling I find 1843x1382 is fairly common (but not 1843x1381).
Note the white circle I've added to the 'dog' on the sofa (screen left). This no longer appears to be a dog to me when I lighten it up in the most basic photo edit (increase exposure, reduce contrast).
Of course it is a dog. Notice the longer rear right leg, spreaded towards the room. Your white circle shows the rear end of it. It's also a rottweiler, because you see no tail. Rottweilers used to have shortened tails due to cropping.
You are right.
But I have to believe there is a reason they have gone so far beyond just saying, He is our POI so we are appealing for evidence... Now what could the reason be?
Of course it is a dog. Notice the longer rear right leg, spreaded towards the room. Your white circle shows the rear end of it. It's also a rottweiler, because you see no tail. Rottweilers used to have shortened tails due to cropping.
Note the white circle I've added to the 'dog' on the sofa (screen left). This no longer appears to be a dog to me when I lighten it up in the most basic photo edit (increase exposure, reduce contrast).
Of course it is a dog. Notice the longer rear right leg, spreaded towards the room. Your white circle shows the rear end of it. It's also a rottweiler, because you see no tail. Rottweilers used to have shortened tails due to cropping.
I must have missed something where had this info come from?Think there was the 72 year old, someone in the 40's and a younger victim. Up to the age of 20, correct me if I'm wrong, these are the only 3 been mentioned ( as in what has been seen on a video)
I was thinking the white circle area was what would be a dog nose, and was thinking the shape I see doesn't match what I expected it should for a nose? You think that is a dog tail? I was thinking purse or something... I mean I kinda see a dog in the shape of the 'legs'... but just not sure about the circled area (in white). Looks like a double barrel to me (as a description of what I see, not a literal double barrel)...
Imo Charley & Miss Muller are defo in this photo, I’m 100% convinced. Superdad just out of curiosity did you see anything that could have resembled MM in the camper van photos?
I can see clearer that it is a dog on the sofa now, but not a smaller dog next to the gym ball from the edit.