Difficult to discuss with someone that starts with insinuating that I am lying. That he didn't pay his fines is only a small part of the reasoning, so far there is no proof at all that he owned anything, even the Jag is in someone else's name. It turned out the VW wasn't his. If you trust what MT says about the stash, great. MT tells the truth, but I don't.. wow!
There is not even any solid proof that he owns what would be his largest asset.
The reasoning for saying that it was in 2008 that he had the Rolexs ect was because AB said it was on later trips, considering CB arrived there 'pretending' to be skint again late 2007 it would be logical to think that it was 2008
Can you show me where I have said he must not or must own anything, I usually use maybe/might/possibly or even probably, but don't remember using definitve terms like must or does own anything unless there is factual evidence to prove it and not just hearsay.
If you bother to look you might find something and take it out of context, but honestly I don't care.
I mean, look what you just did with the neighbors quote, c'mon you can do better than that.
It must be my writing style or it might be something else that makes you think you can have a dig and hang me out about the authenticity of what I said about being locked up for non payment.
That's not very open minded is it? IMO