Must we fasten our seatbelts?
I think that will be more than that, Super.
I can read something like an hydrogen bomb in his unspoken words.
We're all, Super.
What's intriguing is his pressing on Brits.
It's them all who will fall from their chairs.
Something to do with the parents would be my guess. There's already enough theories out there that he could choose to latch onto and if he's been meeting with Amaral as reported, we already know where that guy's interests and persuasions lie.IMO he gave the hint already.
"I'm confident this case will not go to court and the British media will lose interest in my client."
That could only mean two things, especially after meeting GA.
1. Blaming the parents
2. Blaming the Royals
Did i forget something?
IMO he gave the hint already.
"I'm confident this case will not go to court and the British media will lose interest in my client."
That could only mean two things, especially after meeting GA.
1. Blaming the parents
2. Blaming the Royals
Did i forget something?
This report says yes.Doesn't NF live in Bavaria?
Let's wait and see. He's offered no evidence as yet about his findings (why?) so the claim remains sensationalist until he backs it up. And there are obvious reasons for him to cast doubt on the investigation. The only thing I find professional and clever about FF is how to be a good defence lawyer, whose job is purely to get clients acquitted regardless of guilt.Herr Fülsher looks too clever and professional for that.
He means something quite formidable for Braunschweig investigation.
NF was questioned prior to the appeal, if the number was hers, they would have established it prior to now, you would think. Cant see her phoning in to a Crimewatch programme to volunteer that information later on. JMO.This report says yes.
https://www.fr24news.com/a/2020/07/...n-for-the-first-time-since-being-exposed.html
I thought her trace could give some clues. But it seems that HCW did not give her much importance.
The mysterious phone call ...."Entirely dependent upon s/he coming forward".....Frustration.
How many "Fischer"-Boys had been adopted by the faithful "Brückners"?
Hopefully that question isn't too offensive....!
Yes, he's doing his job. His job is to get his client off, regardless of guilt. I'd be wary of giving credence to sensationalist claims he makes, while refusing to back it up (for some apparent reason). If you're going to claim the man is 'kind' in any way, well, I don't know to respond to that. I thought you might have reserved judgement until we hear the evidence.Herr Fülscher is doing his job. It's LE job do the other part. He's not ready to offer his findings that surprised him (in DM's words) for some reason. Even though the question is merely rhetorical, answers might be waiting for proper time, having red tape to fulfill before (most probable IMO), need to prepare all details or to tell his client before, and so on. He was kind enough to let us know in advance.
Maybe Amaral and CB were having dinner together on the 3rd May.
Was just thinking it could be something like this he is going to come out with.Can't help but think he is going to point the finger back to the McCanns or their Tapas friends. David Payne always sounded dodgy to me.
Was just thinking it could be something like this he is going to come out with.