they have only recently come out,. So we know nothing yetDo any of these alibis have a reliable source?
DNA is person-specific so I can't see that there could be any defence against the presence of Madeleine's DNA, were it to be found in any of his vehicles.Feel free to pick this apart as I’m sure there are aspects I’ve yet to think through properly, but is there perhaps a reason CB would specifically state he was having sex in the van? Maybe to set up an explanation for any DNA that may be found in said van?
Just a thought…
It's gets even more confusing from MWT...
The UK version of the doc is now being given a different title. And tying in with his previous tweet about the first episode being 90 minutes long instead of 60 as AMC are advertising, it sounds like these are going to be different versions of the documentary...
OK, so this is the title of the first episode.
the series is called : "Madeleine McCann: The Prime Suspect"
and/or
"Madeleine McCann: Investigating the Prime Suspect"
the first episode is titled
EPISODE 1: THE CASE AGAINST CHRISTIAN B
and supposedly the second:
EPISODE 2: TESTING THE EVIDENCE
and
EPISODE 3: TESTING THE ALIBI
let's see if ep1 and 2 have been made into 1 or if episode 1 is discussed for half an hour by MWT.
in the below tweet by MWT
https://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/1520346444397428736/photo/1
there is a transcript for 2 interviews on his MacBook - on the one he is discussing with someone about how the documents (?) were obtained and whether they were illegal or stolen, and on the other MWT is discussing with a Nick F. about a BBC Panorama story. The first one is timed at 13':57'', meaning that it could be 15 minutes before and 15 minutes after the episode where MWT is being interviewed about the documentary...
but to be honest I think that both of these transcripts are irrelevant to MM and CB!! (one appears to be about Diana and the other about JSaville....)
in any case, maybe indeed for the UK programme he is introducing the documentary for 15 minutes before, and then concluding it for 15 minutes after?
and this is what AMC has:
“Madeleine McCann: Hunt for the Main Suspect” TV Show premieres May 3rd
From your link:
“In an unprecedented involvement, former detective Mark Williams-Thomas uncovers new and exclusive information: revelations from Brückners mobile phone that link him to the moment of Madeleine's disappearance and the clues that link him to a recognised German paedophile ring.”
Also:
“Mark tests this statement by identifying the girl and talking to her current partner.”
Anyone still have a link to the article where the partner spoke to the media? About “just wanting it over and done with”?
So why talk to the current partner, he probably didn't know her when she was 17,. Why isn't she talking. and also mwt was filming this last year, so it's not up to date if you get me. Imo, but I look forward to watching
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-brueckner-26851632
Brueckner, who is suspected of abducting three-year-old Madeleine, says he drove his young sexual partner to the airport at Faro, Portugal, for a flight home the day after his alleged crime.
The pair were stopped and photographed at a police roadblock, he said.
this then must refer to the next day, the 4th- surely he has provided his alibi during his 2013 witness statement about his exact whereabouts...
Brueckner claimed he was miles away, along the east coast towards Faro, by the time Madeleine disappeared, between 9pm and 10pm.
Faro is not THAT long a way from PDL... and if he was towards Faro, then he could just be a few miles away... surely the masts close to Faro would have picked up his phone?? oh, and if he drove towards Faro avoiding tolls, then he could also have some time in Odiaxere...
German police reportedly found a photograph of the woman lying in Brueckner’s campervan, during their investigation into a rape for which the 44-year-old is now serving a seven-year jail sentence in Germany.
If this is correct, then the BKA would have managed to track her and check with her their "relationship" already...
"We actually haven't found a single piece of the puzzle in the two years that would have somehow helped to exonerate Christian B,” Mr Wolters said.
they know about this woman - there is no alibi corroborated there... jmo
Just watched a Sky News report that included S.Vieira ( CB former lawyer) ..he said CB's alibi might be correct...
" as CB was a straight person "
Think he is meaning CB talked straight about things...but is there just a chance someone such as CB is a bit economical with the truth sometimes...perhaps ..maybe..?!
Just watched a Sky News report that included S.Vieira ( CB former lawyer) ..he said CB's alibi might be correct...
" as CB was a straight person "
Think he is meaning CB talked straight about things...but is there just a chance someone such as CB is a bit economical with the truth sometimes...perhaps ..maybe..?!
“I’ll tell you that I wasn’t attacking anybody in my life after I was 18.” But also…CB is always be economical with the truth, at 18 he became was a perfect gentleman, and committed no more crimes, obviously he has selected memory
Not sure what MWT is saying here. 3 x 60 minute docs for the rest of the world starting tomorrow and a 90 minute special in the UK on the 11th? But in the caption it says "From" the 11th, implying there's more than one episode. Is it different in content in the UK to elsewhere or did Channel 5 perhaps just want to run it as 2 episodes rather than 3?