Sunshine95
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 651
- Reaction score
- 1,835
Please help me out here, those passengers who used stolen passports... What ever came of that? My mind continues to go back to those people... TIA
Its good wishful thinking however as we have talked before then they would have gone for an emergency landing close to shore.
There is no way they would fly 7 hours south in the middle of the ocean with no chance of help from people on shore.
The pilot was proven to have on his simulator runways that were available to him. Even if no communication the pilots are trained to fly by sight if they have to. They have emergency training for every possible situation and if no communication and even at night they have instructions and training to emergency land. I've read a lot of the emergency protocols for loss of communication at night. At night is all the more reason the plane would have tried to get near land, airport, or city lights to keep visual contact. Having visual contact with ground lights helps the pilot if no instruments are working.
Everything I have read said to get to nearest airport and obtain alternate communication by flying low to use cell phones or satellite phone if they have them. Or alternate VHF radio communication if that is only thing working. The emergency protocols I have read even talk about pilots should have hand held compasses available to them, flashlights, etc. The flashlights are used to view the instrument panels if lighs on the panels are out.
None of the emergency procedures I have read says to fly into the abyss away from land and away from help.
Remember the 1 plane that crash landed in the ocean near a popular travel beach destination. It worked really good because people on shore immediately phoned for additional help for them and boats got to them quickly and saved some people in the water.
I know we have talked about all this before and we all tend to go around and around on things because its all we got.
None of us really know for sure what happened but IMO I have ruled out mechanical failure due to the plane not trying to get to nearest airport as all emergency protocols say to do.
IMO, I am leaning towards 1 of 3 things.
1-It was shot down
2-It was hijacked by pilot or someone else and crashed either on land or water somewhere much more closer to where last communication was done with ATC
3-A combination of 1+2 with pilot trying to get his friend's court case reversed and was demanding this or he was going to fly into a building so they had to shoot it down before he approached any buildings
If it was shot down I can think of at least 2 reasons why. Either a country just made mistake thinking it was hostile and now they want to hide their mistake OR #3 above and the Malaysia government or military are trying to hide their involvement. There was enough time early on for them to pickup all debri in the sea if they knew exactly where they shot it down.
All JMO on things. The only thing I am certain of is Malaysia has sure acted very sketchy from the very beginning and I agree with the families that they feel they are not being told the truth from the start. Its like Malaysia has said to everyone...."Go Home People. Nothing more to see around here".
Please help me out here, those passengers who used stolen passports... What ever came of that? My mind continues to go back to those people... TIA
FOX executive fired after using company email to plan aid to kin of missing plane's passengers
http://www.usnews.com/news/entertai...utive-fired-over-fundraising-email?src=usn_tw
FOX executive fired after using company email to plan aid to kin of missing plane's passengers
http://www.usnews.com/news/entertai...utive-fired-over-fundraising-email?src=usn_tw
I know what you mean .. that all got dismissed very quickly and easily .. and I wonder why.
Yet it makes the most sense, considering the last known location of the plane (and excluding the satellite pings, which in my mind could be from any unidentified aircraft, perhaps even an Indonesian or other one flying anonymously at that time, one that landed safely).
Occam's razor.
IMO She and her husband should stick with their current professions and leave this to the experts. I was all for her kindness, until, I read the stipulation.
A condition of accepting the money she hopes to raise: Recipients must waive the right to seek legal remedy.
FOX executive fired after using company email to plan aid to kin of missing plane's passengers
http://www.usnews.com/news/entertai...utive-fired-over-fundraising-email?src=usn_tw
Just when you think the sideline stories couldn't get much crazier - they do...
Why use your corporate email address though?
Words practically fail me right now. This wifey has lost her job, and achieved basically nothing? And the plane is STILL missing...
I don't know if it was dismissed or not, or if it was even true...
I don't believe the plane went down in the Gulf of Thailand or South China Sea
The Gulf of Thailand and South China Sea were searched early on..during the first week the flight went missing. The US Navy had 2 ships in the area
Once they found out the plane turn and headed west the search continued on the Straits of Malacca and Andaman Sea
That body of water the plane was flying over is considered shallow (less than 800ft in depth)
If the plane had crashed in the water in that location IMO the searchers would have heard the pinging from the flight records
I also believe there would have been a Fuel slick since the plane would still have had most of it fuel
And debris..
Oil Rig location
Dept of Water in Gulf of Thailand and South China Sea
http://7thgradegps.wikispaces.com/f...gif/223130744/381x591/South_China_Sea_Map.gif
:twocents:
I don't know on how big planes "crash" into water, but is it possible it nose-dived straight down in one piece, then broke apart upon impact on the sea bed?
I still don't understand why no debris hasn't appeared. :sigh:
FOX executive fired after using company email to plan aid to kin of missing plane's passengers
http://www.usnews.com/news/entertai...utive-fired-over-fundraising-email?src=usn_tw
IMO She and her husband should stick with their current professions and leave this to the experts. I was all for her kindness, until, I read the stipulation.
A condition of accepting the money she hopes to raise: Recipients must waive the right to seek legal remedy.
Oh wow. This person was VP of Standards and Practices. Can we say, "I really should have known better..."????
jmo
When you use a company email address you are basically saying that you are acting on behalf of the company. Unless there was a plan to get an exclusive interview, but there seems to be no connection to the company. jmo
I don't know on how big planes "crash" into water, but is it possible it nose-dived straight down in one piece, then broke apart upon impact on the sea bed?
I still don't understand why no debris hasn't appeared. :sigh: