I'm personally satisfied with all the discussions and conclusions we've had about the window and evidence of a break-in. I think that we've brought up every report and every reasoning down to minute details that give the reasons it's credible that there was a real break-in. We've been discussing that window since at least thread 9.
In those discussions, we've shown that there is a scuff on the wall, contrary to other statements that there isn't. I agree with everyone who says the strongest evidence that the window is climbable is that EVEN the motivation report had sense enough to know that, even if it doesn't know anything else.
We've shown that there is debris from that scuff on the wall on top of clothes that were right in front of the window, which proves it came off the feet of the person entering through the window.
We've shown how the rock landing in the bag, tearing the bag and coming down is probably not likely something a stager would have done.
We've shown that the force of the rock hitting the inner shutter made that inner shutter hit the waredrobe, which caused clothes to fall out of it.
We've shown where RG tripped on the cable wire causing the TV to shift on the waredrobe, which also could have caused clothes to fall out of it.
We've shown that glass is clear across the room, something that wouldn't happen if breaking the glass from an open position inside the room, with the glass facing the inner shutter, the waredrobe and the wall.
Additionally, there was talk of a piece of glass that wa imbedded in RG's shoe that showed up in his bloody shoe print. It looked like a y shaped impression. This piece, I haven't read very much about, but it's indeed out there.
We've discussed how the report relies too heavily on FR's uncertain recollections, and I have read that RF has a lot of friends in ILE because she was studying law. Therefore, that's the reason her testimony carries such heavy weight. Let's remember, she's also the first one to insinuate that the break-in was fake. She didn't say it, but she said the thief was stupid for not taking anything and there was glass all on top of the clothes. No, he didn't take anything from FR, but he did from MK--including her life. And not every break-in happens because of money, BUT money was missing, as were phones. And yes, Glass was on top of some clothes because FR's room wasn't as clean as she claimed.
When FR even arrived at the house, her first concern was for the break-in, not for MK's room or locked door. That's why FR was able to rifle through her room, shifting the crime scene before everyone was told to get out of the house. So I'm not sure what the discussion was about breaking down MK's door, but whatever it was, FR was making sure none of her crap was missing first.
