Reasons for clearing WS
Owns no gun
Fathers shotguns cleared
Tyre molds and vehicle don't match
No motive
Was at home asleep/on nights
Text phone history
Still a couple/amicable relationship
Attended July family gathering together
Doesn't own sandals
Poly inconclusive.
Visibly upset, distraught and griefstruck.
No arrest
No evidence
Not a one of this list can be said "beyond a doubt". We only have a suspect's words for most of them.
Guns? He says he did not own a gun, but had access through his father. He could have access to other guns via relatives/friends, too. From his own words he said he hunted, and from his experience in the military he probably was a good shot.
Tires/vehicle? We don't know if the tires/vehicle match his --- did he ever say what he drove? Would we believe him if he did? Did he borrow or rent a vehicle ?
Motive??? He had plenty of motive if we want to be nit-picky. They broke up, they may or may not have been making plans to get back together. She was going to visit another man. She left him, and apparently tried to stay on good terms. How close they remained is unknown to anyone here. Who paid the bills? Who made the most money? Who was continuing with education? Who had the most to lose by her death? Lots of questions, no real answers.
Family gathering: I didn't follow the discussion on the July gathering..... did we see pics or texts? Were they happy together then, or was she just going along to keep things "cool"? We can never know what Ally's true feelings were at any of these events, and people can put up a good front yet still feel differently than what we see.
Sandals? Have we seen inside his closets/rooms/car??? My husband would say he doesn't own sandals, but he does wear those rubbery things occasionally as slippers. Maybe he has something that could be similar to sandals but he calls them something else.
Visibly distraught/upset/griefstruck? Maybe ---- or maybe it was an act. Words can be deceiving on a forum, and manipulated however we want. But those three emotions do not generally end up with calling posters names for disagreeing, or cursing and threatening to banish mods and other posters, etc.
He did not show a strong indication to find Ally's killer, but to clear his own name/reputation. Sorry, but even a distraught ex BF would not behave in such derogatory behavior, IMO, even if they were offended by a crime forum intent on finding the right killer. Even in their grief, they know we are here to help, and will disagree with some things, agree with others.
No arrest? They don't have all the evidence they need and will not make an arrest until they do and can guarantee it will stand up in court.
Evidence? We don't know what evidence they have or do not have, but according to LE they
DO have evidence that it was likely someone she knew. What that could be is only a guess and I won't go there right now.
I think so. She's not a case insider is she? Maybe someone with longer time in WS can weigh in.
Yes she is considered an INSIDER and a PROFESSIONAL, and has the same responsibilities/rights as all VERIFIED INSIDERS. NOTICE HER TAGLINE: "
Verified Associate Editor of the Tri County Times"
If you check back, CM's tagline was
"Verified in Alexandra Brueger" ..... it did not say Verified INSIDER, either.
See the verification for "professionals/insiders"
Verification Process for Professional or Insider Posters
AND HERE:
Professional Posters & Verified Insiders