I watched Dateline's episode this weekend on the death of 12 year old Garrett Phillips. The man charged (NH) with his death was acquitted almost 5 years later this past Fall. There wasn't any DNA evidence but video and other circumstantial evidence. He felt he was being wrongfully accused and summoned an army of support, filing a civil suit for violation of his civil rights early on. Guilty or not, I think his response is more typical of what one would do if they believed they were innocent and being accused (even if only in the court of public opinion). Unfortunately, it doesn't appear likely Garrett will ever get justice. However, I think his case is a reminder of how crucial it is to be patient with LE as they gather and process the evidence pertaining to DS.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/...ry-potsdam-murder-trial-garrett-phillips.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/...ry-potsdam-murder-trial-garrett-phillips.html
I couldn't have said it better myself so anyway and jd125.
I also believe SG holds the key to Danielle's disappearance, regardless of just how acquainted they may or may have not been.
Msm reports talk about SG and SG only. They aren't saying " a security guards home was searched along with seven other homes" instead they have reported that his home was searched and items where removed from his home.
The fact remains that DS is still missing and her family deserves answers.
If SG has nothing to hide then why not speak up and proclaim his innocence? If the media was insinuating that I had something to do with a missing persons, I'd be screaming from the rooftops about how innocent I was. I understand that all people may react differently under extreme pressure but still, what else are people left to believe here? We have to base our theories from the few facts that we have. To me, it doesn't sound unreasonable at all to assume that SG is probably responsible.