As far as if anybody saw DS leaving MetLife, when you pull into the complex, this sign is the very first thing you are greeted with. It is quite a nice office building, very well maintained with good tenants. Huge sprawling parking lots. I would think every square inch of the place has cameras, and that every inch of the exterior parking lot is covered. If FG is involved, and is/was a security guard at this facility, he would know better than anybody that he would be video taped talking to DS or following DS out of that lot. If LE says they saw her talking to somebody at the office in the lot, it is because it was caught on security tapes. DS leaving the building would be on the tapes. The security camera system, ironically, is how somebody like FG would know DS's patterns of coming and going.
The cameras are not conspicuous, but the facility is so nice I am sure they went to lengths to not have big ugly cameras on poles or on the corners of that building. They let you know they are there with the sign when you pull in. I couldnt see any when I was there.
What puzzles me is that she slightly deviated from her schedule that day, and how could that be anticipated by the Perp if he was planning to follow her or intercept ?
How would someone know exactly what time she would arrive outside her apartment building, assuming she made ot home ?
If DS was intercepted between work and home, and the Perp was in her Jeep, where was Perps vehicle ? Was it left behind and retrieved ? That gets so complicated.
If DS was intercepted at work it is on security video. That would be the dumbest method for Perp IMO.
If DS was intercepted in the Jeep, and Perp returned the Jeep at a later time, why would the purse and identification be left in the Jeep ? That is the single biggest red flag.
If DS is being held against her will, Perp will need to come and go from that location. If it is FG, he can not do that with LE up his rear.
Where is FG and wife staying, since the Berkley house looks abandoned ?