Lia_
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2016
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
I think that as far as metlife goes, it makes sense to me that they offered a reward, especially because in addition to danielle working there, her mother has worked with them for 25 years. She has a mom who has been a loyal employee and she became one as well. Even though it's a large corporation, showing appreciation and support for a family who has been part of metlife for 25 years seems like a natural move to me
Now, as for IGA, I'm not sure. Perhaps they knew that they were going to be getting plenty of negative press for not having proper security lighting or cameras and the reward was a way to get a bit of positive press to counter balance the negative. If you think about it, in pretty much any coverage about the case it is mentioned somewhere that the apartment complex did not have any security cameras. At least now it's also brought up in every media coverage that IGA is offering up a 50,000 reward.
For people who are on this site, who have an interest in looking deeper into these stories, it triggered questions about motive BUT I've been in the room with other people when her story came on the news and for people like my mom and brother, who aren't interested enough in things like this, the reward comment on the news illicted a "well that's nice of them" kind of response and then they moved on from the topic without a second thought....so, for the public who doesn't really bother to dig deeper, IGA can get a positive response or view from them and hope it takes some focus off the lack of cameras.
Now, as for IGA, I'm not sure. Perhaps they knew that they were going to be getting plenty of negative press for not having proper security lighting or cameras and the reward was a way to get a bit of positive press to counter balance the negative. If you think about it, in pretty much any coverage about the case it is mentioned somewhere that the apartment complex did not have any security cameras. At least now it's also brought up in every media coverage that IGA is offering up a 50,000 reward.
For people who are on this site, who have an interest in looking deeper into these stories, it triggered questions about motive BUT I've been in the room with other people when her story came on the news and for people like my mom and brother, who aren't interested enough in things like this, the reward comment on the news illicted a "well that's nice of them" kind of response and then they moved on from the topic without a second thought....so, for the public who doesn't really bother to dig deeper, IGA can get a positive response or view from them and hope it takes some focus off the lack of cameras.
Now I understand MetLife for doing a PR move to protect the image.*
But as far as the IG management complex.*
Why?