Are we approaching this with logic or are we defending a friend? I have no relationship with either--neither DS nor the SG so know I am not motivated by what I THINK, is becoming a problem here.
For instance, it seems like a lot of people defend DS claiming "she is a good person and would never get involved with him". As a person who stands firmly on a fair playing field I ask, Why can't a good person be involved with him? Do we know there was something defective about him? None of us know if he was separated. None of us know if he was going through a divorce. None of us know if he had an agreed upon open marriage. Maybe he made her happy, made her feel special? Maybe he was fun, exciting, bright? Or maybe he did the unthinkable. We don't know. Maybe they went out on a date that night. The point is, why do some of us point a finger at him instinctively without having many facts to go on? To those who know Danielle, know it is highly unlikely anyone here would criticize her. On the contrary in order be helpful we want to consider all possibilities. This isn't a Facebook popularity contest. Facts, facts, facts, the focus!