I also wonder what reasons LE has in continuing to question JT's "alibi" over two years later, ESPECIALLY if it's true that he passed two lie detector tests as well....
I wonder this as well. Based on what I know, the alibi seems pretty solid for the time of the murder. After work on Sunday (what time?), Julia spoke with Jennifer on the phone (what time?).
Later, Julia texted around 10:30pm. On Monday morning Julia did not show up for work (what time was she supposed to start?). So it seems that the murder was commited between
10:30pm and Monday morning. During that time, JT was at home with his wife and other children. Now, to be completely precise one must say that the text message perhaps doesn't prove she was
alive at the time. Someone else could have used her cell phone to send the text message (but somewhat unlikely). I am also not sure if LE is really questioning this alibi for the time of the murder.
Also, even if JT had deceived Kimberly and Jennifer in some way, it would seem strange that he would leave the house in night or early morning to drive to Ypsilanti to commit
murder, premeditated or not.
"This is due to the fact that he has not provided detectives with a formal statement as to his whereabouts the days prior to Julia's death, thus making him a person of interest," police said in the statement.
source:
http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2015/03/stepfather_a_person_of_interes.html
So it seems that police is wondering where he was
before the day of Julia's death. Does LE have any theory about what happened, or are they just grasping at straws? I think one of the reasons
that LE is (re-)investigating JT may be the fact that some family members have expressed concern that JT may know more about the murder. I wonder how JT could have information about the murder
if it was not he who did it. Did he hire a contract killer or something like that? But then one must question how the killer got inside. How did the killer know that Julia was alone in the apartment etc.
Is it possible that the killer had the key to the apartment? Etc.
What about the toxicology report. What does it mean that it is "inconclusive"? I don't think it has been released. Perhaps there was something remarkable about the report, but LE does not want
to release the information. Is it possible that Julia was drugged in some way?