MI MI - Julia Niswender, 23, EMU student, Ypsilanti, 10 Dec 2012 - #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I keep stopping by, hoping that today is the day that there are answers and JUSTICE FOR JULIA! Ive also been keeping a close eye on Chelsea's case and as I posted on her thread earlier, I just dont understand how LE could have ruled out any possible connection when both cases remain unsolved?! There still seem to be too many simularities for me to rule out ANY CONNECTION. I do know, that no matter connected or not, BOTH GIRLS DESERVE JUSTICE!
 
I hate when cases seem to plateau.... praying for answers and Justice for Julia! ������
 
While we are in a seemingly lull on this site, LE has assured me that they are actively continually investigating this case. Other agencies are assisting and are working in the background pursuing other leads and evidence. We will have Justice for Julia! ! !
 
While we are in a seemingly lull on this site, LE has assured me that they are actively continually investigating this case. Other agencies are assisting and are working in the background pursuing other leads and evidence. We will have Justice for Julia! ! !
Thank you Trojan, know that during these lulls, most of us are still digging, following, and watching for new information. Justice will be served! :)
 
While we are in a seemingly lull on this site, LE has assured me that they are actively continually investigating this case. Other agencies are assisting and are working in the background pursuing other leads and evidence. We will have Justice for Julia! ! !



Thank you Trojan, know that during these lulls, most of us are still digging, following, and watching for new information. Justice will be served! :)


Digging with a pick axe, dmc, such a great place for it here, the things WSers find, unbelievable (in the best way). Trojan1966, ever grateful for word of this and that you share it with us. I imagine we only have bread crumbs where LE has a whole loaf of bread just about ready.

Justice for Julia!
 
Digging with a pick axe, dmc, such a great place for it here, the things WSers find, unbelievable (in the best way). Trojan1966, ever grateful for word of this and that you share it with us. I imagine we only have bread crumbs where LE has a whole loaf bread just about ready.

Justice for Julia!

Well said, Find.

Trojan, your updates are always appreciated. It gets tough to be patient. Julia will get the Justice she deserves.
 
Well said everyone! I know from the various discussions I have with people on this thread that little tidbits are submitted to LE frequently. This stuff adds up, and LE knows how to add, compare or contrast it to what they have developed. As FindHG said, I am so impressed and amazed by what my fellow sleuthers have found! We all have our little area of expertise, and together it can really add up to some interesting leads!:websleuther:
 
News Flash - Jim T's trial for the child *advertiser censored* charge has been rescheduled to start on August 3rd (originally scheduled to start Monday, June 29th).The final pretrial will now be on July 24th. Why was this rescheduled? I don't know yet. One possibility may be that the prosecutor needs more time or has uncovered more evidence. Hopefully some more information may show up in the media soon.
 
News Flash - Jim T's trial for the child *advertiser censored* charge has been rescheduled to start on August 3rd (originally scheduled to start Monday, June 29th).The final pretrial will now be on July 24th. Why was this rescheduled? I don't know yet. One possibility may be that the prosecutor needs more time or has uncovered more evidence. Hopefully some more information may show up in the media soon.

Great to know. Trojan1966, thank you for sharing this "News Flash". Sounds encouraging. If there were nothing there, then it would have been quick and done, seems possible.
 
If that were to be the case, why wouldn't they just proceed with the trial and be done with it?
I'm curious as to whether the motion to delay was initiated by the prosecution or JT's defense. :thinking:

I know that Kim, Jennifer and Kim's brother were seen on a Friday a few weeks ah going into the Monroe Courthouse. Hmmmmm go figure!
I also know that Kim DID not want any of us to know that the trial on June 29 for JT *advertiser censored* case was canceled. I believe that she only wanted the Red team to know about the Red Team, thank goodness for recordings, spies & our own investigation.
 
I know that Kim, Jennifer and Kim's brother were seen on a Friday a few weeks ah going into the Monroe Courthouse. Hmmmmm go figure!
I also know that Kim DID not want any of us to know that the trial on June 29 for JT *advertiser censored* case was canceled. I believe that she only wanted the Red team to know about the Red Team, thank goodness for recordings, spies & our own investigation.


I don't know if saying Kim did not want any of you to know is fair. I think that since she is not speaking to certain individuals, and the fact that she can see that individuals are getting the information themselves may be more likely. JMO

As far as seeing her at the courthouse - I will not speculate.
 
Since people who seem to know "why" this trial was postponed will not provide us with the information, I will contact the Circuit Court and the Prosecutor's office on Monday. I only feel that everyone here needs to know exactly what is happening concerning this case. I have always tried to be truthful in posting what I know and had hoped the same would be true for all verified users as well as other members. Why would this "reason" be such a big secret? Possibly it will be posted in the media before Monday.
 
Child *advertiser censored* charges are very easy to prove. You just have to know who was the one logging in if multiple people use said computers. Jmo. You can get 20 years from that alone. Jmo.
 
Child *advertiser censored* charges are very easy to prove. You just have to know who was the one logging in if multiple people use said computers. Jmo. You can get 20 years from that alone. Jmo.

I don't think you can get more than 4 years for possession of child *advertiser censored*.
http://courts.mi.gov/education/mji/publications/documents/sg-manual.pdf
The max is 4 years it seems to me (750. 145 c (4)).

Generally child *advertiser censored* charges are easy to prove. In the chase where the indivuals in the images/videos are not clearly minors, it may be difficult to prove that they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
260
Total visitors
406

Forum statistics

Threads
609,539
Messages
18,255,361
Members
234,681
Latest member
moth__guts
Back
Top