Interesting twists and turns in this case.
Recovered semen apparently from someone who had a vasectomy. Grandma states JT had a vasectomy but has LE confirmed this through medical records? Did Grandma know about the boyfriend and him having one as well?
If the semen is indeed from a male with a vasectomy, approximately 90% of the male population is eliminated as suspects. It appears that JT is not in that group. Thinking of her age group, one might consider the possibility of her wanting to get married and have children. If a male suitor had the procedure done, she might not want to pursue that relationship after finding out about it.
New twist, JNs sister claims in a Detroit Free Press post that JNs boyfriend had a vasectomy. As I recall, no previous public mention that she had a boyfriend at the time of her death. What boyfriend? If I'm recalling correctly she had a date with someone very close to her murder and many didn't know much about him. So who is this boyfriend that had an vasectomy?
According to everything I researched, DNA samples can still be found in the semen of men with vasectomies. If so, there appears to be no DNA match to JT otherwise he would have been already arrested. This is a good point. I wonder is there still information that was not released to the lawyer that LE was not required to put into the documents.
No DNA match to JT from the latex gloves. Not exactly. There were two male DNA's found. One is not JT and other is too weak for comparison but was deemed to be male DNA. http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2015/09/documents_detail_allegations_a.html#incart_m-rpt-2
Best friend originally testifies that JN confided in her that JT sexually abused her. A few months later she recants her story. Why the sudden reversal? This seems very odd to me. Who is the best friend? The name you mentioned in response to my previous post is interesting.
He passed not one, but two lie detector tests. I know that theyre not conclusive but he still passed two. Has LE ever stated he actually passed or were their words inconclusive? The issue I have with this is, in my opinion, inconclusive means they can't prove he told the truth or lied. I don't put too put weight on this anyway. I have no love for the individual representing JT and my memory of the information he has been involved with the lie detector tests from the start. Enough said there...
As to the FBI Profiler making JT his prime suspect, remember Richard Jewell (96 Olympic bombing). Through the analysis of the FBI profilers, the FBI made him their principal suspect. How did that turn out?
The affidavit only includes the minimal amount of information for a judge to sign off on the search warrant. That being said, I believe LE has other evidence pointing to JT that has not been made public. Things like:
JTs and JNs cell phone records any calls, texts or emails between the two on Dec 9 and Dec 10
JTs cell phone location history was he in the area of JNs apartment on Dec 9 and Dec 10? Im assuming he carried his phone with him at all times since he was running a business. (if you have an android phone, go to www.google.com/locationhistory to see how easy it is). LE works with the cell providers using much more sophisticated methods. What if he turned the phone off during certain hours? Could that be traceable as well?
Based on cell phone location history, LE probably has a good idea of where he was the days prior to the murder. They want to interview him to get him on record of his activities and whether they match the location data. Basically looking for inconsistencies. This makes a lot of sense, my hope is they have more that we aren't seeing. Because what I have seen so far makes me so heartbroken for Julie.
There could be damning statements about JT from other friends, roommates and associates of JN. This would be last on my list because there has been very little of these so far and one even flip-flopped. I feel it gets tricky here because there are very few vocal opponents against him. I keep this under what else do they have that we are not aware of yet.
LE has a more accurate timeline of JN last hours than what is publicly released. Could any time information be extracted from her phone since it was submerged under water? (like a watch stopping) Would the water disable the phone to the point it stopped working and pinging the nearest cell tower to determine the time it went offline (time of murder). Her phone in the water made me think of the camera in the washer. They were still able to retrieve the photos from the camera. Could this also be the case for the phone and if not, could the data be provided by the cell provider?
