Hi all,
Guess I'm new here, but have been on lots of other crime/justice sites on the web. Took me awhile to get on websleuths but let's get to some sleuthing on what's always a sad case.
When I did a profile for the Nevaeh case a week ago it came out that, assuming the abduction report wasn't false, and the mother/caregivers had nothing to do with it, then a Monroe local did it, who was a situational molester (he'll do it if the situation/ circumstances are right), whose alcohol content on the middle day of the holiday weekend was up, and his inhibitions (those he had) were down. I proposed he'd have a record for child sex or similar crimes, or if no record, be known to those he knew as a molester or suspected molester. That he was there that Sunday for some other reason, off work, lives there, visiting, hangs around the playground behind the parking lot on school days, and as above was drinking.
Now of course we have the body found about 9 mi. west of the town, 11 mi. from the abduction site. The body area is so rural, off the main track, that again olny a local, would know of it, or even think of going there. In fact this offender felt so at home and comfortable at the spot, he took time to mix and pour conrete there, and was so fond of the Rasin river stream, he made the shallow grave, and poured the concrete only 'inches' away from the waters edge (which ruined the concrete). So, not only is it most likely a Monroe local, but a locals local, who knew this out of the way site so well that his relatives or he himself may own rural property there (he had to get the cement/tools from somewhere). As the site is usually only known to local fishermen, we can suppose besides being local, he fishes too.
Well, maybe all this was said before on the forum, but like I said, I'm new.
