The bridge serves a wide range of youth. At the time, there were not wide spread awareness of a lot of diagnoses, and many are new; oppositional defiant disorder, Autism, pervasive developmental diagnosis, social communication disorder and so on and so on. The treatments and medications are still constantly changing as patterns are identified. The bridge was a place where youth could go to 'take a break', that was safer alternative than running away. If Amy's parents thought she had gone there, she must have gone there before. She's been described as social. If she met someone there, who was troubled, and also lived locally, would she have developed a friendship? Could she have gotten out of the car at the gas station to talk to this person, expecting to chat?
She's also been described as bullied. Could she have seen someone she knew from school, gotten out, and then something worse than being pushed down the stairs on crutches happened? I was following the stories on Facebook, and the comments on there were very mean not only to the family, but in some cases to Amy herself. Why speak so ill of someone who had a tragedy occur?
I'm really just trying to look at things from a different angle. I hope that the police were able to gather quite a list of people to talk to based off of the comments that inferred, or straight out stated they knew something about the case.
She's also been described as bullied. Could she have seen someone she knew from school, gotten out, and then something worse than being pushed down the stairs on crutches happened? I was following the stories on Facebook, and the comments on there were very mean not only to the family, but in some cases to Amy herself. Why speak so ill of someone who had a tragedy occur?
I'm really just trying to look at things from a different angle. I hope that the police were able to gather quite a list of people to talk to based off of the comments that inferred, or straight out stated they knew something about the case.