missy1974
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 10,142
- Reaction score
- 31,356
So state and prosecution are arguing about the fluid that's on the floor. I thought before today that it wasn't bodily fluid but state seem to not be discounting that by their question just now about AC still running in the car and therefore no condensation...
If this is bodily fluid, would that not be evident on the clothes he was wearing. Were the clothes destroyed before being able to be examined? Samples of the fluid on the floor would have been taken at the scene no? I'm confused as to why this is being argued. It should be known either way and therefore not arguable?...
I'm behind because I had to pause for a few minutes. But I thought it was possibly urine too, others pointed out to me that it was there before he was on the ground and in one of the video's we saw today, I can see it there. Also, I did see it dripping from the car on hmmm Keung's (I think) body cam video the other night.