:thumbup:
I think people also get confused if they forget that the robbery wasn't made public until the following Friday.
Until then, yes, the police chief left out any comments about the robbery and BOLO. But from then on, he consistently said that the initial stop was for walking in the street, but that Officer Wilson made the connection during the altercation.
I tend to think he realized it when he passed by and gave them another look when they didn't get out of the road, and that's why he backed up.
Some thought the report this morning that they were in his way meant he couldn't have passed them after that. I don't think that's conclusive, but who knows.
Either way, I've kept track of the official reports, and they line up fine.
... Regarding the record entry... Reading both relevant tables, I thought it looked just like the sort of timestamp artifacts I experienced when I was doing some freelance database work. The date wasn't always a reflection of when I did something, but when I added the fact that I did it to the record. The second page notes that something was added to the record at that very time.
So, yes. I don't see any red flags with regard to either statements or the report, either.
And if there were, and it mattered? Parks would be all over it himself.