katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 68,456
- Reaction score
- 249,538
Because it wasn't. They said there were not broken bones.
So if it was not broken, then he was not seriously injured? I am trying to understand how that has anything to do with the outcome of the case. IF MB PUNCHED HIM AND BROKE something, that would matter somehow, but if nothing is broken, then it doesn't matter? I don't understand that reasoning.
To Me, the issue is whether MB did or did not assault the officer. it does not matter if anything was fractured or not. jmo :cow: