ATasteOfHoney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 5,898
- Reaction score
- 243
No, it's not a popularity contest. But, let's say that an officer arrest is in a questionable altercation. Let's say it's determined that there is nothing there warranting discipline but the community he's working in continues to have strong feelings about it (not the rioting and looting type strong feelings, but just strong feelings). Instead of letting matter stew, the County would have the opportunity to re-assign them from say West County to South County. They are able to continue to effectively police all areas and yet, at the same time, take some small steps to avoid problems down the road. To me, doesn't seem like a big deal. To me, those determination lie only with the department. Hopefully they have leaders who can recognize where potential issues are and can work to avoid those potential issues while not easing up on their policing activity and not disciplining the officer.
I will admit, my wording wasn't very good in my earlier post but I was trying to go for brevity when I probably should have explained what I was saying.
I understand about the brevity thing, believe me....no problem whatsoever.
I think one criticism with what you're suggesting comes to mind, imo: your suggestion could be a good thing from a community standpoint (particularly if their are either rogue cops or if there's a lot of crime happening). However, it may not be a good thing from the perspective of maintaining law and order and I'll explain why.
For instance, say LE arrests a very popular gang leader. Now the community starts to get mouthy and doesn't like it. Chaos ensues.
To restation the officer over that type of thing is not prudent in the sense that you're making authority into a popularity game. And the loudest mouth wins.
Eventually, all you'll be left with is either LE who are very apathetic, LE who are on the take and are corrupt themselves, or LE who won't make any waves, or no LE left at all.