Lovejac
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 12,281
- Reaction score
- 1,655
bb
:thud:
I know right?!
And he's getting all of this air time on major networks :facepalm:
bb
:thud:
Just struck me the media is all focusing on the wounds --- the real curious item here ought to only be :
why is his back totally clean
IMO that is far more important question!
:gaah:
I have been trying to figure out how to word this without insulting anyone so I hope it comes across how I am intending it. (Regarding the right arm issue)
Josie says that MB was taunting Wilson before "bum-rushing" him. Usually I'm good with picturing situations such as these and in my mind's eye, I can see the way MB's arms would be during said taunting.
I am NOT saying this happened, but just picture MB taunting Wilson, perhaps saying, "What you gonna to do? What? What?", with both arms half up, kind of shrugging and his arms are spread out a bit.
ARGH! I don't know if I can explain this correctly without saying exactly what I want to say.
I'm trying to find a pic or video of what I mean.
That is not actually what he said. He said that the injuries are in the front. But that the arms are mobile. Same thing that Cyril Wecht said today. It is possible that he was shot in the arm from behind. If he was running his arm would have most likely been facing front side back at some point. So it is possible. The wounds are on the front of the arms yes but they could have been facing back when he was shot.I guess so. Dr. Baden determined the shots entered his arms from the front. He actually examined the body. I'm not sure why some are trying to disagree with it.
JMO
The wounds to face/head could have happened as MJ fell to his knees and bent forward in pain.
My thing with the autopsy is after 10 days of witness after witness protraying this as the officer is blasting away this kid as he is fleeing an officer of the law gives a different impression than learning that his back did not even have a scratch --I just have to disregard all the witnesses - it is not like this subltle (!) running away or toward in dayligh ought to result in consistancy. AUtopsy and endless eyewitness stuff do no t add up
The only thing that makes sense is the cops friend today and the autopsy they add up, make sense, and if they would just tell us if there was a bullet in the car that would confimr or invaladate the cops story.
If they would just release pics of officers injuries that would validate cops story.
There , at this point is no reason not to at least do that - worrying around influnecing witnesses when witness statements the last 10 days have been proven to be not only off but totally the opposite of science fact-- nothing on his back !
He was not shot when he was on the ground. There are no witnesses that say that. He was up when he received the shots. The head shot is the one that killed him and took him down.
If he were standing still with arms up, would he have fallen backward or forward?
Retweeted by FOX2now
George Sells ‏@GeorgeSells 42m
Looters shoot their way into Ferguson area business. Wait until you see this video. Unreal. 5pm @FOX2now #Ferguson pic.twitter.com/ZenPpKste5
That is not actually what he said. He said that the injuries are in the front. But that the arms are mobile. Same thing that Cyril Wecht said today. It is possible that he was shot in the arm from behind. If he was running his arm would have most likely been facing front side back at some point. So it is possible. The wounds are on the front of the arms yes but they could have been facing back when he was shot.
I believe that the forearm wound was caused when Brown was rushing at/advancing upon Wilson.
But I allow for the possibility that that specific wound could have been received from behind. Although it does not line up with the other injuries IMO which appear more clear cut as having come from the front. But I do not claim that forearm was not possible from behind.
Everyone who doubts it's possible stand up please. Now place your hand on your hip. Where is your forearm pointing/facing? To your rear.
Possible yes. Likely - I think no, based on the other wounds, the placement, the grazing wounds etc make it more likely that all the shots came from the front. That is my opinion. I do not confuse it with fact though. It is simply more cow talk.
Is that because white people are racist or because it's a reputation that's been earned?
The attorney said otherwise. One of the shots entered the top of his head and out his eye according to the autopsy. Because Michael was taller than the officer I don't believe it would have been possible for him not to have been kneeling or slumped in someway for the bullet to follow the path it did. IMO