But I think if this was as bad as her family states, there would be LOTS of docket entries. This one is short and sweet, that usually means not much contention or fight.I saw that there was a default judgement regarding the paternity...is that what you are referring to? The motions and filings in both those cases are not publicly available so we have no way of knowing what happened.
I could be wrong, but I thought the early reports stated that she put Lisa to bed at 7:30pm and checked on her at 10:30pm on her way to bed.
I could be wrong, but I thought the early reports stated that she put Lisa to bed at 7:30pm and checked on her at 10:30pm on her way to bed.
FBI not posting a reward, not putting the baby on their site as "kidnapped." Why not? Are they that positive she wasn't kidnapped?
Congrats, KaylynnCouture, this one was your 5,000th post.
Baby Lisa's Parents Take Questions From Reporters - YouTube
At :45 JI says WE checked on Lisa and WE realized she was gone.
At 3:14, DB says it was only JI that went into the room to find Lisa missing.
At 2:00, DB looks to JI to answer the question about what the boys are saying and wondering. IMO, the boys may know the truth and she looked to JI to answer this difficult question.
At 2:55, JI says they took all the phones so he or DB could not call anybody. How does he know why the phones were taken? Why did he need to look for his personal cell phone to call 911 if he just arrived home with his work cell phone? Why was his personal cell phone on the kitchen counter next to hers? And of course the big point with the phones is why didn't they bring these missing phones up from the get-go in their interviews?
At 4:33, DB says we are trying to hold it together for our boys. Mentioning Lisa, staying strong for her, is a secondary thought. I think this could be an unintended subtle admission that it IS about the boys, custody of. And that Lisa is gone.
At 6:30, JI is quick to answer the question that the baby wouldn't cry if picked up by someone. It's as if he wants to defend the scenario they have staged, rather than contemplate the question. Also, I find it unlikely the baby wouldn't cry. MOO.
My question is why the metal detectors in the backyard? This seems a little weird to me as not much time has passed. LE would be able to determine if soil had been disturbed recently so why use metal detectors? The only thing I can think of is that they would be looking for something really small or something older than last week. But what and why?
Has it been determined when Debbie went to bed?I know that she stated she put Baby Lisa to bed at 10:30, but I never heard when she actually went to bed.
Oh, darnit!!! I wanted my 5,000th post to be "praying for Baby Lisa!". Lol. I had it all planned out, and then I forgot to pay attention to the post count.
And while we are at it 'YEAH CHIEFS!'Go CARDS!!!
This stat is for all children and adolescents in the US that were held for at least one hour in 1999. I double checked before I posted it and found it here:
http://crime.about.com/od/stats/f/faqkids.htm
What neighbor? The teenage neighbor?
Well, if DB said she had the window open earlier, and someone was watching the house maybe they knew this so they thought it would be the easiest point of entry, never thinking she left the door unlocked. This of course, depending on if any of what she has said is true. I'm still on the fence on this case, go back and forth just don't know what to think.:crazy:
They're most likely looking for the missing cell phones. Cell phones can be detected with metal detectors.
When I'm following a case, I will never say I disagree with a fellow poster even if I do. However, I will make an exception. Go Brewers!
Go CARDS!!! .
And while we are at it 'YEAH CHIEFS!'
That is your take on it and I respect that
To me the only thing abundantly evident is that LE have named no POI or suspect and are still looking for a missing child.