What specifically are you directing us too?
Not directing to, but directing away
I just see alot of talk about banks. I'm not clear on the significance.
I get that we have like this tiny smattering of details that restricts us to common themes :
Told cop she was low on gas
Declined transactions at the QT
Getting pulled over once? twice?
What time did each of those things happen?
I get it. yet, it's likely unimportant to a large degree imo.
The important part is why she went up that way and who she was meeting.
If she didn't get pulled over that'd be the same.
If she didn't get her card declined, that'd be the same.
If she was low on gas, that'd be the same.
Not trying to stop anyone from discussing it, if they want to. Just voicing the opinion that it's likely not the key to anything.
Now if there was bank footage in parkville or whatever, that might reveal new info. But I'd hope that they'd have been doing that kind of thing on the day she went missing and the first week. If they didn't, then I have further skepticism about the competence of LE.
But even still.. we don't even seem to know how anyone got a ping in parkville -- that could just be the new answer to "which way did she go??", which is possibly yet another diversion.
My impression is that the focus should be on people around her and what motivations they might have to harm her. Not family, but those whom she associated with regularly. They know more than they are saying, so that is where the focus should be.
For us.. it's frustrating, because what can we do on that front? we are simply bystanders.
But, in the end, I'll be very surprised if any of these details are of any importance to finding her or as to why she was targeted etc. Now, surveillance videos and dashcam footage, possibly so. They could reveal something about Toni's state of mind or sobriety level. right? Might just be me, but that's something I wouldn't mind excluding.