When I typed the word 'feds', I was referring to federally employed agents whom are assigned to this case. I should have been more specific, and I apologize for any confusion that this may have caused you or anyone else. For example, the ATF, US Marshals, and the FBI are actively involved in this investigation. Agents whom are employed by the FBI, US Marshal's, and the ATF are employed by the Federal government, which I was abbreviating by using the term 'feds', which is a term for federal agents.
I was not intending to indicate that there is any assumed friction between local law enforcement and federal agents in Panoply County at this time pertaining to the JC case. I should have been more clear here as well, and taken more time to clarify my point, which was that it does happen, in some circumstances, that there can be some friction (good choice of descriptive word, btw) between the two. There are times when local law enforcement officials are thrilled to have federal agents assigned to their cases, and greet them with open arms, appreciative for any assistance that they may be able to provide. This is often the case. Alternately, there are some instances where federal agents are not greeted with such eagerness, and there can be an underlying resentment of sorts, depending on the situation. This is an interaction that federal agents are trained in, there have been seminars and continued education courses provided that were required for federal agents to attend, in efforts of improving the general partnerships with local law enforcement officials during dual investigations. Where I provided a link in my previous post that was from the hate crimes page, I should have included this as well "http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0537/chapter12.htm". This is an OIG Audit report regarding FBI and local law enforcement interactions. This goes without saying, if there were no issues of friction between the two, there would have been no need for an audit. Audits are not cheap, and they are time consuming. Worth noting is, "Several FBI field division managers emphasized that professional relationships are dependent on the personalities of those involved". This is true of any occupation, especially one such as law enforcement and investigations. It is also worth noting that the FBI by nature is not forthcoming out of necessity to their duties as federal agents, so expecting a detailed breakdown of their interactions with local law enforcement officers is setting yourself up for failure.
With the FBI adding $25,000 towards the reward, and the ATF contributing $10,000, this is a good indication that they are personally and professionally invested in this investigation. Why is this? That's for everyone to decide for themselves. I did not mean to indicate that JC's murder was a hate crime by providing a link from the FBI's hate crime page. I was intending to provide a useful quote pertaining to the FBI, which was located on that page. That being said, could the FBI be involved because they are investigating this as a hate crime? Sure. Could it be because of possible gang involvement? Sure. Could it be because of possible relation to serial killings? Sure. Perhaps some other form of organize crime? That's possible as well. Could it be due to a suspicion that there has been a violation of another federal law at the base of the murder of Jessica? I don't believe that we can rule that out, either. Could the FBI have been assigned simply to assist local authorities with their advanced investigative resources (laboratory analysis, DNA, technologies in tracking phones and data,etc)? Sure. That wouldn't really explain them putting up their money for the reward, but still possible. Could the FBI also have gotten involved because the victim is from a family associated with local law enforcement? Could be. Could they have already been in the area for another purpose, as some other WSers have indicated on previous threads? Sure. The only thing that is for certain IMO, is that anything is possible at this point. To answer your question/assumption that the FBI will not interfere with the local authorities, this is somewhat on target, however they may choose to prosecute a crime even when local law enforcement does not. The presence of a federal crime has presented itself in the case of JC, IMO, and that is apparent by the federal agents' continued involvement and financial investments into the reward fund.
I do apologize if there were any misunderstandings in my post or anything that led to confusion on your part or anyone else's. It was somewhat a rushed post, just spewing out my opinion. That is my opinion, however, and my opinion does remain the same in that things are not always peachy and loving between local law enforcement officials and federal agents who are assigned to their cases. You are correct in saying that there has been no indication that there is any friction between the two, and I could like to add that there has been no indication to the contrary, either. Not that it is even relevant, for the most part, but I did want to take the time to respond to all of your questions.
That simply is incorrect. At this point there has been, as far as I know, no indication of a separate federal investigation. The FBI can only "take over" if there is a federal crime, and even then will not interfere with the local authorities. The BATFE, U.S. Marshall, FBI have been called in by the local authorities to assist due to their expertise. This is very common and generally the assistance is very much appreciated by local law enforcement. There has been no indication of friction between the local, state, and federal authorities. You have provided a link to the FBI hate crime web page, but there is as no indication yet this was a hate crime. And by "Feds" I wasn't sure if you were referring to the US Attorney, the FBI, ATF, U.S. Marshalls or who else. All are separate entities, several in different departments of the federal government.