mck16
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 7,472
- Reaction score
- 8
This is getting ridiculous. None of us has much "real" information on this case. We have a few statements which have been scrutinized to death, and many assumptions made based on those. Presumably, JT has much more *official* information than we do. He has direct access to LE, and while they may not tell him everything, they certainly have told him more than they have to US.
So, to automatically assume that JT is LYING, when his information does not match our cobbled-together assumptions is taking things a bit over the edge, IMO.
You don't have to believe every word he says, and, healthy skepticism is warranted, but to just discount everything he says is completely unfair. Lawyers do have ways of saying things that "imply" something - for example saying the boys have been interviewed for 5 hours... could easily mean 5 hours "between them" and 5 hours of police PLUS independent interviews. But he is not going to out-and-out lie about it.
JT has a reputation to maintain. And his reputation will go straight to crap if he starts telling bald-faced lies. He's not going to risk that for any client.
Very logical post and I agree with it totally. LE is the only one who has any answers and they are not revealing those. They have even said that they have known about the video and the sightings for a long time and have been following up on them. I really don't think there is much information we can share with LE that they don't already know. And I am sure there is much more we have not heard. jmo