Could some of these be for the oldest son, especially like the two for 6/25/11 for Sandy Parsons?
Could some of these reports on Sandy Parsons be for the oldest son, especially like the two for 6/25/11?
Does anyone know if it has ever been confirmed that one of Erica's half sisters talked to her on FB last year, asked her how she was doing and she replied "I'm fine". Supposedly she was going under a different name and this was after she "went to live with Nan".
Casey PARSONS: I cannot find no Facebook. Brittany said though that she had it under a different name. Um, Brooke is gone, isn't she? Brooke remembers the day that Brittany said - we actually even have pictures of where Brittany wrote Brooke where the Facebook thing was - my daughter, Brooke - pictures of her saying where she talked to her & Erica replied, "I'm fine."
Reporter: I guess, obviously this could be a law enforcement question too but they don't - they're not answering questions. With cell phone technology, internet technology, court records, you know, where people live, things of that nature, um - search warrants, they can come see your phone records, cell phone records, whatever - you know, why can't they find a 15 year old girl?
Casey PARSONS: To my knowledge, they've never even looked at none of that stuff yet. And why, I don't know. 'Cause I've asked myself the same thing. We've welcomed them to come here & do whatever they have to do. Anything. & they're welcome right this minute. They are. We've told them to dig the yard up, look in our house, look at anything. They're more than welcome to do that. More than welcome.
Casey PARSONS: That's what Brittany - Brittany said. Do you remember the name that Brittany said she was going under on the Facebook? When she wrote, "Are you okay?" & she wrote back, "I'm okay."? You don't remember that? Have you got that still on your thing?
Female off camera: She just told me about how she just wrote her about a few months back and all she got from Erica was, "I'm fine."
I am still hung up on the relatively simultaneous arrests of BDG on 8/7 and 8/14 of this year....and TLS, his former/current girlfriend on 8/11. TLS has very blonde hair and the two of them have extensive records.
Casey PARSONS: She knew all of Erica's information, she knew her birthday,
her biological father's name, which we had only met him for like, I had 5
minutes in my whole life. She knew all about him, her birth mother, all her
other half brothers & sisters names. She even knew my other kids, my biological
their names, the city we lived in, she knew my phone number, she knew
everything about us. She said Erica's biological mother had given her the
information to contact us.
But, they also told me the girl that was with Strawberry -
her daughter died in a car wreck and that come out that was a lie and she's alive
8: biological grandparents not alive.
Maybe? Casey seems to have something in Sept 09, as well. This was four months after the son got his first 'Communicating Threats' charges.
Until this point, the family seems relatively quiet, since Sandy's domestic charges in the 90s. Things seems to 'amp up' with James' arrests. Who were the antagonists? Could Casey and Sandy be covering for their son? Casey seems to be quiet loyal to her inner circle....but vicious with anyone else. I could almost see her holding out to the bitter end, rather than implicate her son for something he *may have* done to Erica.
OR...
She is so malevolent that SHE is the antagonist, and everyone else in that home are just pawns in her deceptive schemes. Maybe a good chunk of James' charges are a result of her provocation and/or outright implications with LE? He seems to be 'levelling out' while staying with his uncle.
I wonder what is going through Sandy's mind while physically separated from his wife? Does he develop a sense of clarity or a sort of panic?
Just thinking....
Maybe? Casey seems to have something in Sept 09, as well. This was four months after the son got his first 'Communicating Threats' charges.
Until this point, the family seems relatively quiet, since Sandy's domestic charges in the 90s. Things seems to 'amp up' with James' arrests. Who were the antagonists? Could Casey and Sandy be covering for their son? Casey seems to be quiet loyal to her inner circle....but vicious with anyone else. I could almost see her holding out to the bitter end, rather than implicate her son for something he *may have* done to Erica.
OR...
She is so malevolent that SHE is the antagonist, and everyone else in that home are just pawns in her deceptive schemes. Maybe a good chunk of James' charges are a result of her provocation and/or outright implications with LE? He seems to be 'levelling out' while staying with his uncle.
I wonder what is going through Sandy's mind while physically separated from his wife? Does he develop a sense of clarity or a sort of panic?
Just thinking....
Here is my "high-tech database" on James Parsons' criminal background (public record):
not sure if this had been posted yet? The fbi put forward a push for new information from the public to assist with the timeline
http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/fbi-urging-public-help-piece-together-erica-parson/nZpjM/
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/09/07/4294103/fbi-adds-new-publicity-poster.html#.Ui3SJ-B9FZ8
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/kidnap/erica-parsons/view
from the fbi poster: Investigators have determined the information the parents provided was not true.
When she arrived in the United States, Quita says, she thought she was “coming to a nicer place, a safer place. It didn’t turn out that way,” she says today. “It turned into a nightmare.”
The teenager had been tossed into America’s underground market for adopted children, a loose Internet network where desperate parents seek new homes for kids they regret adopting.
Because private re-homings often bypass the government, the only vetting of prospective families is done by parents who want to get rid of children. That creates the possibility kids could fall into the hands of dangerous people. In the group Reuters analyzed, more than half of the children were described as having some sort of special need. About 18 percent were said to have a history that included sexual or physical abuse.
In July 2006 - within hours of posting an ad for the 10-year-old boy she had adopted out of the U.S. foster care system - Glenna Mueller met Nicole Eason and Eason’s friend Winslow outside a hotel near Mueller’s Appleton, Wisconsin home. There, Mueller gave them the boy, along with a note saying they could care for him. “I wanted this child gone,” says Mueller, a former daycare provider.
Not until January 2011 did an official responsible for overseeing the U.S. child protection compact call attention to the “grave danger” of the online network. In a nationwide alert, an administrator for the ICPC warned that adoptive parents were sending children to live with people they met on the Internet.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was asking if your records for Sandy Parsons for 6/25/11 for Landis might not be for Sandy Parsons II (Maybe even just traffic violation?) as Voter Registration still shows Sandy and Casey Parsons registered in Concord since 2008 (Wonder if they have valid driver's licenses?) and Sandy Parsons II registered in Landis as of 2010 (Wonder the same-of course now in military-probably innocent kids IMO).
Yes, I think you have the blame game antagonist theory thing going in the right direction there.
not sure if this had been posted yet? The fbi put forward a push for new information from the public to assist with the timeline
http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/fbi-urging-public-help-piece-together-erica-parson/nZpjM/
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/09/07/4294103/fbi-adds-new-publicity-poster.html#.Ui3SJ-B9FZ8
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/kidnap/erica-parsons/view
from the fbi poster: Investigators have determined the information the parents provided was not true.