I must admit I was baffled by your medical terminology which I suspect was intentional. I contacted a friend of mine that does have medical knowledge to go through it with me to see if your claims had any substance. Together we decided if you were taking the finger injuries and unexplained abrasions alone into consideration without any other autopsy facts or character analysis yo u may have a point
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/222365300326784712/ Here are different areas of the skull
The right frontal, bilateral parietal, left occipital, and left temporal scalp has confluent, pinkcontusion/ecchymosis. On the right side of the forehead is a 1 x 1", raised, purple ecchymosis withoverlying 7/8 x 3/4", irregular, superficial, red-brown abrasion and 3/4", linear, superficial, redabrasion. On the right temporal region is a 1 1/2 x 3/8", irregular, superficial, red abrasion. On theright parietal scalp is a 3 1/2 x 2 5/8" coarsely stellate, complex, branched, full-thickness, lacerationwith partial avulsion. The branches individually range from 1/2" to 2" in length. There is underminingaround the wound up to 1" in depth. The edges have abrasion and tissue bridging is evident. Skullfractures are visible in the depths of the wound. Inferior to this wound, on the right parietal-occipitalscalp, is a 1 1/4", linear, vertically oriented, partial-thickness laceration with tissue bridging andminimal undermining. On the right occipital scalp is a 1/4 x 3/16", irregular, superficial, red abrasion
On the left frontal hairline is a 1", curvilinear, superficial, red abrasion with a background of pinkcontusion. In the left frontal scalp is a 2", curvilinear, full-thickness laceration with two superficial,1/2", jagged extensions; it has undermining of up to 1" on its lateral side. Just lateral to this fullthickness laceration is a 1/2" jagged, partial-thickness laceration. On the left parietal scalp is a 6 1/2 x4" coarsely stellate, complex, branched, full-thickness laceration with partial avulsion. The branchesindividually range from 3/4" to 2" in length. Anteriorly, it has is undermining to a length of 2";posteriorly, there is undermining to a length of 1 7/8". The laceration has extensive tissue bridging. Onthe left temporal scalp is a 2 1/4", curvilinear, full-thickness laceration with slight marginal abrasionand with evident tissue bridging. It has inferior undermining to a depth of 3/4". On the left occipitalPage 2 of 8 F201507355 26 August 2015 17:55region is a 1 x 3/4", irregular, superficial, red abrasion.The inferior right orbit has a 2 x 1 1/2" area of raised, purple ecchymosis. Within, overlying the inferiororbital ridge, is a 1/2", curvilinear, superficial, laceration. Also, there is a 3/4 x 3/8", irregular,superficial, red-orange abrasion. The nasal bones are palpably fractured. No other facial fractures arepalpable. On the right side of the bridge of the nose is a 1/2 x 1/2", irregular, purple contusion, withinwhich is a 1/2 x 3/16", irregular, superficial, red abrasion. On the tip of the nose is a 5/8 x 3/8",irregular, purple contusion
Jason was hit with a weapon to the front side and back of the head. How can you explain the injuries to the front (which seem to the most extensive) if indeed Jason was strangling molly and wouldn't let go. He had abrasions which could also be from the paving stone/brick as it has an uneven rough surface or as you are trying to say were scratch marks, there is no evidence provided to say how these abrasions came about only that they were epidermal.
On the right upper gums is a 7/8 x 3/8", irregular, red and purple ecchymosis bruising to the mouth again consisted with a blow to the front of the face
On the right side of the chest are a few scattered, irregular, superficial, red abrasionsranging from 1/16" to 3/8" in greatest dimension; these may be in association with the previouslydescribed defibrillator pad. On the right lateral chest is a 3 x 1/2", roughly curvilinear, superficial, redbrown,abrasion. On the right lateral abdomen is a 2 1/2 x 1 1/2" irregular area of discontinuous, pinkecchymoses = bruising
the abrasions again mentioned scratches or uneven surface of landscaping stone?
On the superior aspect of the left shoulder is a 1 1/2 x 1/2", irregular, superficial, red-brown abrasion.On the mid upper back is a 1 1/2 x 3/8", irregular, superficially abraded, pink-purple contusion. Inferiorto it is a 1 3/8 x 1/2", irregular, superficial, pink abrasion. On the right upper back is a 1 1/4 x 3/16",linear, pink contusion.
These are only on the surface of the skin could they be post mortem to back up the self defence claims? To me if somebody was choking my daughter and I came from behind with a bat I most certainly would be hitting as hard as I could and do a lot more than superficial damage.
Now your bug bear the injuries to the hands specifically finger 2 and 3 of the left hand
:
On the dorsum of the right hand is a 1/4 x 1/8", irregular, superficial, red abrasionwithin a 1/2 x 3/8", irregular, blue contusion. On the dorsum of the right 3rd finger are three irregular,superficial, red abrasions measuring 1/16", 1/8", and 1/8" in greatest dimensions. The right arm has nopalpable fractures.
These injuries are again superficial they are not as extensive as you made them out to me
:
On the dorsum of the left forearm are a 1 1/4 x 1", irregular, pink contusion and a 1 x3/4", irregular, pink contusion. On the dorsum of the left hand and 2nd and 3rd fingers is a 5 x 2 1/2",irregular, raised, pink and purple ecchymosis. The left arm has no palpable fractures.
I disagree that defensive wounds are mostly on the palms . It is true if the victim is trying to grab a sharp object example a knife that there would be wounds to the palms but trying to grab a bat or landscaping stone wouldn't have they same effect as trying to grab for a knife . To me this doesn't sound as if the fingers were being pulled back. I would say they were repeatedly hit with an object again its my observation of the situation based on the evidence we have at hand as the autopsy doesn;t go into detail about their findings other than it is homicide
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/d9/e8/65/d9e865a87659b315b2f1005c0d234ec6.jpg
: On the medial aspect of the right thigh are a 2 1/8", linear, superficial, red abrasionflanked by multiple punctate, superficial, red abrasions. On the right shin is a 1 x 1", irregular, poorlydefined, pink contusion. On the lateral aspect of the right knee is a 2 x 1", irregular, pink contusion. Onthe dorsum of the right 4th toe is a 1/4 x 3/16", irregular, superficial, red abrasion. The right leg has nopalpable fractures.LEFT LEG: On the anterior aspect of the proximal left thigh is a 4 x 3", irregular, pink-blue-purplecontusion, within which is a 4" linear, red component. The left leg has no palpable fractures.
The injuries here are consistent with being hit from the front . The shin the thighs the knee the dorsum of the toe all in the front. But he was being attacked from behind?
The calvarium hascomminuted, jagged fractures, most extensive on the right parietal region underlying the large,aforementioned laceration. However, fractures also extend through the left parietal bone. Thin, nondisplacedfractures extend through the occipital bones. Jagged fractures extend through the middlecranial fossae and sella turcica, creating a hinge fracture. Additionally, there are comminuted fracturesof each middle cranial fossa and of the cribriform plate.In each temporal region, the dura is peeled from the skull and there is a thin film of epiduralhemorrhage. Also, there is a thick film of diffuse subdural hemorrhage. Thick subarachnoidhemorrhage is on each lateral cerebral hemisphere and there is diffuse, thin basilar subarachnoidhemorrhage. The cerebellar hemispheres have patchy, irregular, focally thick subarachnoidhemorrhage.The ventral frontal lobes have patchy, irregular, contusions measuring up to 1/2" in greatest
Jagged fractures Im wondering if this is consistent with a landscaping brick being the weapon as it may have an uneven surface a piece may have broken off and become jagged ? Jagged is inconsistent with a bat
Im sorry all these abrasion,contusions,bruising,fractures they took time. Are you trying to say Jason never released his grip the whole time he was being beaten to death ? Are you trying to say Molly could have been strangled for that long without any markings hoarsness or any kind of physical evidence of this . Was Jasons blood and tissue found under her fingernails from these abrasions that are all over Jason body . I have never seen evidence there was . My conclusion is Jason was attacked from the front and the back. His injuries are consistent with this , I do not know why he didn't retaliate . Maybe thats the kind of man he was how do I know . I think its very sad that he is dead and his families loss and there are people out trying to ruin his reputation and have accused him of every thing from tax evasion being violent and killing his first wife .I do believe character will come into this case. Molly in my opinion has shown she is not afraid to say what she feels she isn't afraid to stand up for herself I just do not see her as a victim of dv her strength and character is too strong I don't know her personally so she may be different to my assessment I feel she may have been too involved in with kids lives and maybe Jack rebelled as he was getting older and that might explain the alleged incidents. I know we all want to stay involved in everything our children do but this is a natural progression unfortunately. I don't know how Tom heard the argument from the basement and Sharon didn't . If she did why not call 911 ? I don't know why a landscaping brick would be on a "nightstand" as ye say in America. I don't know why Tom would say the bat was new if it wasn't. I don't know why they would change their plans suddenly and not arrive till 8.30pm . So they decided not to leave till 3pm ? I don't know why there would be tradozone in Jason system when its not recommended with people for heart conditions. Did he know about them did he have medical checks at work? Why did Molly and Mike try to access his office? Why try gain custody the very next day? Why did Mike try to organise a funeral without any input from Jasons family? Why ring insurances compaines to find out about a policy ? Why withdraw large amounts of money from bank accounts? Lastly my biggest bug bear
Why totally erase your husbands life and show absolutely no remorse for his death . Im sorry if there are spelling mistakes or repeat questions