stmarysmead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,302
- Reaction score
- 16,923
Agreed, I have already felt that is the road they would take from the start and that is why I have been critical of the justice supporters and the media campaign at times, it was very easy to see what route the martens were going down from the very beginning and the social media aspect really has played right into their hands at times . Before anyone mentions mollys medias campaign, I am well aware of it but i do not care about mollys medias campaign. This is about the corbett family seeking justice but unfortunately, social media campaigns may not be necessary helpful. in terms of mona earnests page,it was obvious her fb page was left open deliberately to attract commentary and I was exasperrated to see people still leaving nasty comments on it up to very recently. That said, its up the lawyers to deal with such matters and if there were in fact threats etc made, they will be dealt with legally and not online.
I too, as mentioned yesterday would be interested to hear more of these alleged phone messages from Jack. Are they new messages or the previous crank one referred to some back ago. Not sure I can refer to a comment from the justice page here, if not, I will remove it.... but a comment was posted referring to the fact that it would seem the martens were not concerned that jack may be missing his stepmother and was trying to contact her but more that Jack was trying to get her break her bail conditions, didnt really make sense to me, does this mean he was actually trying to speak to her. These calls/messages can be easily traced anyway so hopefully more on this will be reported as this could be quite a development if true.
with regard to the emails, it was emails between the martens and their defence lawyers that were disclosed and included with discovery which imo was a serious mistake. Attorney-client privilege is there for a reason. the prosecution would have got an idea of the strategy they were taking, possibly what witnesses they would use and other details not known to them. Its a shame that happened, the defence are looking for anything at all to use to discredit the investigation.
Excellent post.
I also read that post on the J4J page. To me, it seemed the poster was trying to make the point that the Martens first thought is that Jack is trying to trap MM, not that Jack sincerely wants to talk to her. Why would that be the assumption about the child? That the child was doing something devious?
I am not sure if we can discuss Mona Earnest...but both she and her husband have been mentioned in the media and Mike Earnest has become the defacto family spokesman. In any event, your point about the FB page is exactly true. Mona has only one other post, from years ago, about cruising...but top and center is the picture if the Corbett children.
The Corbett family has posted on FB for months now that they have demanded that FB rules be enforced and pictures of minor children be removed when the request is made by their parents or guardians. I cannot have your child's picture on my FB if you object, according to FB terms. But the Earnests keep that photo up there and keep their settings to public.
It's a bait trap by the Defense, plain as day. Imagine using children you claim to love that way, as tricksters in a campaign to get away with myrdering their Father?
All my opinion only.