Also why/how would he carry Molly out of the bedroom to the bathroom before bringing her back to the bedroom before TM can fell him?
I was wondering about that too...
I am so annoyed at the coverage that I really need to step back.
There is no understanding of what live tweeting actually means.
They THINK they are live tweeting but they are reporting selectively after the event..
See peregrino's post
defense portrayed as definite statements, whereas the poor sad prosecution just made an attempt at it.. implies theirs was a lesser statement when in fact it was far more powerful
Any journalist worth his slt would have had any line of that out there immediately.
They did not.
Post event they were handed statements.. a good journalist would normally photo the statement and tweet it immediately, they merely reported parts of it and if they saw the slide with the lock of hair, they did not describe it, in size.
A strand of hair refers to more than a few hairs.
They lied when they stated nail contents were not checked..
They were checked and listed in autopsy and described clearly
Re live tweeting. It is a special privelage from a judge and it means real time reporting , live-time, not after the event and not selectively.
It is due to the belief in the publics' right to know and is allowed under transparency
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/live-blogging-and-tweeting-from-court
I'm leaving this here because otherwise info will be scatty and sporadic.
Check them on it and hope and pray that experienced journalists will take an interest in the case .
This is important from the outset.
Here we have a case of a permit being abused and the US publics' right to transparency in livetime /real time coverage being denied.
I think it is very serious.