http://www.kinston.com/news/raleigh-75292-ackerson-police.html
Hayes and his wife have had primary custody of the two children since February 2010. They filed for temporary custody, claiming that Ackerson was emotionally unstable and not economically fit to support the children as she was a part-time employee, working as a janitor at Star Daycare at 217 Washington St.
The facility is owned by Patsy Hayes, the mother of Grant Hayes. Hayes further wrote Ackerson lived with his parents at 1505 Holman St.
~~~
That's interesting. She was "emotionally unstable," and still yet allowed to work in a childcare facility? And live with his mother?
Here is what I think happened:
LA and GH relocate to Virgin Islands from Raleigh in late 2008/early 2009 with their firstborn. LA is an entertainment/event planner for Rare Breed Entertainment, she is booking GH gigs in the USVI as well as a few other performers (I found at least one which LA appears to have a connection to).
LA finds out she is pregnant with #2 from GH shortly thereafter.
GH, in the meantime, has made the aquaintance of AS/AP - who runs an art supply store on one of the islands.
By the end of 2009, and several months after the birth of #2, the GH/LA relationship is frayed. Maybe she found out about AS/AP, maybe because LA lost her job, maybe for other reasons.
They return to Raleigh in January 2010, and shortly thereafter GH has decided to co-habitate with his new girlfriend AS/AP, sends LA and the kids to live with his parents. LA has updated her online resume, she is job hunting. Per the info above, I am sure she helped out her in-laws with the daycare as they were providing room and board for the three of them.
GH and AS/AP are engaged by February when a judge awards primary custody to GH+AS/AP.
GH and AS/AP marry in April, AS/Ap, now AH, is pregnant by September.
LA in the meantime has joined a church in Kinston where she attends regularly and is well liked by the congregation, and she has started a business. She is doing everything she can to improve her standing during the custody battle. According to her filings, it is LA who paid the child phychologist $5K and the extra $5K retainer as directed by the court, while GH/AH are dragging their heels.
By July 2011, LA is back on her feet and stands a good chance of getting primary custody at the August 2011 hearing...especially if GH/AH are delinquent on payments (shows financial weakness for them, strength for LA).
GH/AH have closed down their art supply business (see link earlier in thread to liquidation of stock). GH is facing the possibility of big child support payments, and if they cannot manage to pay the court ordered costs associated with the custody battle...
The motivation here could have been a financial one.