My apologies, I wasn't very clear. I was questioning why you thought KW may have been listed as the victim in the van incident report. I really don't know but wondered if the call was placed by her or a neighbor. She obviously didn't show any injuries and nothing more was made of it. Really trying to get the mindset of whether she called and perceived herself as the victim. IMO, it was a very turbulent household and I suspect they contributed equally to the arguments and possibly even drug use.
From what I gather it was her vehicle, so I think that's why she was listed as victim, not necessarily that he then started on her after she got back. I wouldn't rule it out that he might start on her after she got back, but then why wouldn't he be charged with assault on her?
We don't know who called the police in, perhaps it was a neighbor who called quietly in case EK turned from the vehicle on his property onto another target?
As to EK's potential level of violence, there was another MSM report that noted that cops were called due to an altercation between EK and another woman, and yet another woman was named as the victim in the altercation, and they said that happened in the week between Mariah's disappearance and EK's arrest. Sorry for not having the link handy but it has been posted previously in this thread or near the end of the last thread.
The allegation that KW tried to run over AW's fiancee. It sounds like a more passive aggressive type of violence from vindictiveness. AK also describes vindictive behavior from KW toward his fiancee, saying that KW was making up something about HC having cancer and blacking out, therefore the children shouldn't be in her care...that strikes me as vindictiveness. From AK's interviews, I think he said that KW and AW were sharing custody a lot better before HC came on the scene, and at that point KW started trying to find more ways to prevent the kids staying with AW. I think all these allegations go together quite well and sound believable as part of a 'profile' of KW. If or how that vindictive streak might come out in her treatment of her own children, I can't imagine. I can imagine a scenario where KW and EK end up bringing out the worst in each other in a lot of ways. I'm also thinking KW might be more skilled in putting blame on EK than the other way around. AW has alleged in documents relating to the previous custody 'fight' that KW lies and covers things up, I think it's possible that she might try to spin a battered woman story to LE.
The other thing I keep thinking about is when AW described what he heard on the speakerphone conversation with KW's father, and it was alleged that KW told EK to 'get rid' of Mariah's body "because *we all* would get into trouble" (paraphrased).
Is *we all* a dialectical term connected to y'all and all y'all? It seems to suggest that from KW's perspective she feels that both EK and KW are complicit in Mariah's death or the lead-up to it. I can't see EK lifting a finger to hide a body if he doesn't feel complicit in it.