Thanks Mountain. I removed my post.. awaiting for the new thread, but the link doesnt work. I will put it back up so everyone kinda understands where this came from.
And thanks for the welcome, Ive been a member for a while, just not an active poster.
Goldengoldilocks......First all.....welcome to WS!!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with "multicolored" hair if that's what you choose. I'm sure that I misrepresent myself on that post. A couple of posts later I attempted to clarify that it really didn't matter. I'm sorry if I have offended you in any way. Mostly, I think I was trying to be mild by calling her a "nut with unnatural multicolored hair".
I'm sure that Zahra probably wanted it and that this was not some horrible thing that EB did. My post was meant to be somewhat in jest. I would have liked to use much more "colorful" (thats fitting don't you think) terms where she is concerned
Anyway, I extend my apologies if I got out of line for a minute.
My previous post for those unsure of where this came from.
Are my eyes deceiving me or has Zahra's hair been color chunked in this photo? Who color chunks a ten year old child's hair?
Oh wait... the reason is right behind her.
The same kind of nut that has unnatural multicolored hair???
Sorry Guys, Im just reading through the messages. I am taking this to mean that everyone with "unnatural multicolored hair" is a nut?
Please admit me to the nutcase room then. I often have blue, purple, green, pink portions of hair. In my related field this allows me to have some individuality and personality in a place where unhappiness, sickness and death are part of our everyday lives. I also figure it allows me a safe way to show that I am a pretty spunky individual.
My oldest at 10 wanted to dye her hair black from beautiful blonde, I wouldnt let her do her whole head in black, but did allow her chunks of color. I personally do not find anything offensive, or wrong or "nutcase" about using color as a way to express yourself. Many 10 year olds have dyed hair, professionally and not (I used Kool-aid for many years as a young person), we dont know if the occasion for streaking her hair was a victory present for Z for beating a disease that could have killed her. Perhaps she didnt want presents, but wanted to have her hair professionally done with some color.. something I wouldnt even hesitate to give.
"everyone" has come to the conclusion that EB and AB didnt love Z. but we are not either of them and cannot make assumptions of the sort. People show "love" and "caring" in their own ways and perhaps, just perhaps for some reason AB, and EB figured getting rid of Z was for her own good??? perhaps they were thinking that if her cancer was back she wouldnt want to live? Just theory there, but I can see how a parent after seeing their child suffer would think they are saving the child pain and death slowly by murdering them.. quickly, hopefully painlessly.
I just dont want to assume anything, and know that LE will find the answers to the questions when their investigation of this is complete. They have been very thourough and need commendation when this is all done.