Jaiddie
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2016
- Messages
- 527
- Reaction score
- 59
I can't see any of them being named as suspects in court unless law enforcement decides to actually investigate them, otherwise no evidence will exist. Based on what we know now, as Strang has said, it's unlikely Avery is successful unless NEW evidence is uncovered. I agree with that.
But the hard part is that new evidence isn't going to come from law enforcement. It will need to come from private investigators. Which would seem to be alot tougher, since they aren't going to be able to interview people who don't want to be interviewed. For example, if Chuck Avery or Ex Boyfriend were involved, are they even going to want to talk about anything ?
My opinion is that whatever authority that is supposed to oversee and be the check/balance for law enforcement and the legal system in Wisconsin, should be forced to investigate the process of the investigation and the legal proceedings of this case under a larger microscope. Because if that is proven to be unfair, that would seem to have a better shot than trying to do an investigation that should have been done 10 years ago.
jmo
There is a petition for that going around...not sure about rules so I am just gonna put the google link up but it the the first option.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Ini...d+Calumet+County,+Wisconsin&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8