just gonna do some "things" that struck me before I get all "cluttered"
First thing is getting all into the "whole " event - it occurred to me that it is really vital to remmeber ground zero! Running a cops wife off the road and pointing a gun at her ,, in a uneducated, hick like community is probably gonna start a lot of sh$t- (cop mentality) in environs like that. So that IMO certainly lays a foundation for the next 20 years.
I agree but am going to attempt to answer some questions from the "other side."
One the most compelling things of the doc was the lab lady where she is instructed to "try and make him there". If that does not give all the players intent away then I do not know what does ..............a cop overtly telling her to attmept to put a suspect at the scene smells pretty stinky to me.
I agree
Another thing that was profound :
Colburn cop (name may be wrong but you know which one)
So let me see if I get this (he was creepy to me) . Days before the vehicle was located, and before she was reported missing - he calls in her tag number. WTF??
No-that isn't correct - he called the plate in after she was reported missing and the night before it was "found" on the lot
Her car was found without a tag, and on the stand he admitted he was not looking at the car - so the implications regarding foreknowledge seems pretty aparent. IMO
Well, I believe that Colburn stated on the stand that while he couldn't precisely "remember" he probably received the information from someone else as it was related over the phone - in other words, they were looking for this particular car...in other words, her plate #'s were already known to LE because she had been reported missing - if anything the plates not being on the car actually help Colburn because why would he bother to take the plate off of the car? And if the car was found without the plate how could he have been looking at the plate? P.S. Was there a front plate on the car, anyone know?
- gives me the impression that they were getting concerned that she "may" not get reported missing and they got a dead woman they need to get rid of and plant in his backyard?? No - she was already reported missing
. Would love to here the tale about how this dude ,is verifying some tag, from a owners car , before the car had been located. If he called in and said I am in the salvage yard and want to check this Rav 4 info out that would make a tiny bit of sense - but oppsss the tag had been removed , would love to here that tale!
He was never asked how he accomplished that amazing feat.
Bones found in several locations can only mean one thing. Stuff was moving around. If I just hacked someone to pieces the last thing I would be doing is spreading evidence around - its ludicrious. I know - kind of like a visit from Johnny Appleseed
If i murdered someone , and my plan was to burn her up 20 feet from my bedroom, why need do i have to be throwing her in the back of her vehicle for a 22 foot "drive" to the pit?? Makes no sesne whatsoever IMO
I agree with both - and why not use the smelter?
We are true crime followers, and we have seen, countless times the perp leading and or particpating in "searches" by the murderer. Teresas EX certainly implanted himself right in the middle of things now didn't he. So much to the point according to the documentary he was allowed special access on property . Additionally the one special person given the camera , is the one who finds the vehicle just reeks IMO.
i don't think the cousin that found the car was lying. I think she was kind of pushed in the right direction, perhaps
. In addition , this EX being able to somehow hack her cell phone to provide information regarding her cell phone useage sounds like , well, BS. Did his answer satisfy any of you? And he THINKS it may have been his sisters birthdates>
What he did is actually a federal offense but no one mentioned that - wonder if he got immunity
Anyone really beleive , that one can't remember exactly, how one hacked into their murdered ex girlfriends cell phone? I could get not remembering months ago if you had a quarter pounder or chesse or was it a Whopper - but the methods one used to hack into a murder victim ' cell phone seems like it might be a memorable "event" in ones lefe experience !
He was very sly--something a guilty person would do. If you watch his testimony he gave information , but never committed himself to much. How can you remember, a long time ago that you did NOT see her on Sat, but totally recall that you DID see her on Sunday, sitting on her computer chair , but cant remember if the sun was shining or not.
Just in terms of memory functioning it is not how it works. To recall her sitting in her chair, the envorons of that memory would also be capable of being recalling (just by the function of memory of using cues in recall) . Sun up while driving over , or leaving , it gives context to a memory. Got to open my windows am smelling tuna fish!
He was never asked for an alibi in a murder investagation?
Nope - imagine that - neither the ex-boyfriend who still hangs around nor the platonic male roommate
Back to the lucky searcher- the only one given a video camera- we have to remember that the Man cops were not suppossed to be doing anything on the property. They sure as heck could not find the vehicle by law. It would HAVE to be found by private searchers (ones with cameras awesome).
As I was watching it the searchers notions of being scared to death just , seemed like an act to me.. Would you really beleive that some murderer is hiding in the victims car ? And going to jump out and murder you, with tons of LE around? What nonsense IMO
But anyone with a noodle upstaris(!) would have to conclude the speed at which the car was located was nothing other than remarkable. Gosh the only one with a camera. As I watched the doc, I thought theire searching patterns was very atypical.
If someone is trying to hide something, in THAT lot I would not "hide" it on the outer perimeter of the messy place, I would go more into the mess. Locating the car was vital cause it allowed for the search warrents to be implemented (probable cause) - so it was , lets say to get the ball rolling, urgent that vehicle was located .hummmmmmmm
Remember God told her where to look
. The brother ,
And had bad vibes about him in general (Theresa). He was just instantly convneced that it was Avery- if it were my sister I would kinda want LE to do some looking around - casue what if in 10 months the one they only focused on was excluded - 10 months later - cold trail etc . He always made himself available to media
I disagree about the brother - I thought he seemed like a standup guy. He was the oldest son annd obviously felt very protective of his little sister as we would expect a good brother to do. I suspect he was fed a lot of information from LE about SA's background and lots of rumors and gossip that helped convince him that this was their guy
Anyone ever see anything that would resemeble affect about his sister being chopped up? Emotionially he was vacant.
I would be questioning why are you guys only looking at Avery especially since you already , in this very town, did that - wrongly. Bells would be ringing.
Brendons stepdad yucky as well he sure seemed to support that Avery did it - which keeps his step son totally involved ?
Bon fires DO NOT result in human bones looking chopped up - charred yes but to smitherians does not happen.
I don't know but it would seem to me that he would have a better option to use the smelter to burn her than the fire pit in the backyard - yep - just sitting around the campfire watching someone burn
What was the video of Teresa at the end with all this love stuff -- it stuck me as peculiar - to have someone recording her telling the camera she LOVES everyone everything etc etc - relevence?
No one seems to know - sounds to me like a class project of some kind - I think it was used in the penalty phase in order to provide her with a voice
Guys go look at the pics of the key. Before and after --
