The timeline in this article makes me wonder. So, WN went to wake up Celina for a 9:00 appt; after not finding her in bed and looking around the house he called LN at 9:15. BUT: he posted to one of his "friends" on FB at 9:11. Also, what time does that mean he went to wake up Celina for a 9:00 appt? I don't care how close the salon was, would you only give a kid a few minutes before waking them? Something doesn't add up.
Two things come to mind: First, given the state of LN after she was called at work, I don't think she thought anything was wrong when she left the house. Unless she is Grade-A Oscar material, I don't think she could pull that off.
However, even if there isn't an arrest next week... I still absolutely trust this woman knows what she is doing. I just don't second guess her.
Respectfully, this is as foolproof as the "If she floats she's a witch" method of decerning guilt from innocence. What you see as a sign of criminal guilt could just as easily be remorse that he failed to protect her, or an unconscious outward display of his realization that Celina was likely gone, it could have been crushing depression, or maybe he was trying to keep the pictures from blowing away or getting dusty.
And MAYBE, as seems to be the case with so many hearsay information in this case, maybe it never actually happened at all.
Do you suppose the prosecution will use this "turning of the pictures" incident as evidence in their case?
I thought someone earlier said Celina slept on the couch that night because her sister was at a sleepover with a friend.
I have a friend who's brother has Schizophrenia. They had to remove all pictures of people from his room. (he is in a medical facility). Even on medication it upsets him.
Do you suppose the prosecution will use this "turning of the pictures" incident as evidence in their case?
I have a friend who's brother has Schizophrenia. They had to remove all pictures of people from his room. (he is in a medical facility). Even on medication it upsets him.
The practice of covering the mirrors began centuries ago and was based on a belief that spirits were attracted to mirrors. Some people thought that the soul could be trapped in the reflection, or that the dead person's spirit lingered on earth for a time and might reach out from"the other side."
Do you suppose the prosecution will use this "turning of the pictures" incident as evidence in their case?
By guilt, I mean personal guilt, I can't forecast legal guilt considering he is mentally unwell. He was acting guilty by his "turning of the pictures" and his other actions IMO.
How long did he even know Celina? 1 year? IDK. I read that he married LN last fall.
BBM
This is what makes his actions more odd, in my opinion. I'm not saying that he didn't care about the child, but to be having fits in the driveway and turning pictures over when he'd only been married to LN for less than a year seems extremely strange. Again, I'm not suggesting he didn't care -- but to be doing those things, not related to her, not having known her that long, BEFORE he knew she was dead, seems bizarre. MOO.
BBM
This is what makes his actions more odd, in my opinion. I'm not saying that he didn't care about the child, but to be having fits in the driveway and turning pictures over when he'd only been married to LN for less than a year seems extremely strange. Again, I'm not suggesting he didn't care -- but to be doing those things, not related to her, not having known her that long, BEFORE he knew she was dead, seems bizarre. MOO.
Does it really seem feasible, that if the 20 something had something to do with, and I feel LE has a pretty good idea who the guilty party is, that the 13 year old would be allowed to remain in the house?
It is hard for me to believe that if LE thought it was him, they would just sit tight, waiting to make their case rock solid, with the sister in the house, with him and not remove her.
According to WN's FB page, that is still public, he had quite the drunken time at the bachelor party.I have never considered KM a viable suspect in this case. There is absolute nothing pointing in that direction. Nothing. In fact, everything seems to point away from that. Some people are suggesting that he got drunk and raped her and killed her. That's completely out of left field. For all we know, he has never had a drop to drink in his whole life. I am a little surprised, though, that he's staying with that family. Given all of the turbulence, I would expect his parents to welcome him home with open arms. The fact that he's staying with them tells me that he's a very noble young man who is doing his best to help out the family.
My opinion has not changed since the day I learned about the case. I would be very surprised if I am proven wrong. Truthfully, though, I don't care who did it. I just want justice for a little girl and her family and friends.
I'm guessing that LE doesn't have enough evidence to do much of anything. They can't remove the teenager, although her mom could take steps if she felt she was unsafe. What LE needs to do is determine who the guilty party is and then arrest him or her.