Like I said before, I have yet to ever see this story again, it is not in any "historical" context.
So......I am going to phone the Caledonian Record to find out and speak to the Web Master.
Trust me when I say: I am 100% correct that I saw this story.
There was no press release....just a reporter showing up at a scene of an accident that the "driver" had fled from. No one knew who the driver was......so again if you searched the "history" of the Caledonian Record it would not show up under a search for Maura Murray. This story was online.
I do hope that clarifies my position in this matter........
On an additional note:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11059110/
Fred Murray claims police, the attorney general and the governor violated state and federal public information laws by not releasing the
investigative files. He went before a judge last week to ask for access to those files.
The state argued that a missing person investigation
has the potential to become a criminal case, so
details that could compromise the investigation can't be made public.
But Fred Murray still wants those files.........this does not make "logical" sense to me, not at all.
But even though Fred Murray STILL believes that Maura is a victim of foul play, he still wants the files, even though the release of those files could severly jeaopardize the investigation if it ever did "turn" out that "the case did have the potential to have "criminal overtones." This is not logical in light of the position of the Murray family that Maura is a "victim" of foul play and not a "voluntary" missing person.
We're meeting with them and we're also trying to make them(the Murray family) understand what the police cannot tell them and why," Healy said. Healy is the private investigator.......
Oh by the way - the video of Maura "buying" booze is one of the "pieces" of evidence that Fred Murray wanted to "have access to". That would be called evidence. LE knows what "evidence" they have, and that is not "confined" to personal belongings that Maura had in her car.
The files that Fred Murray wants access to is 2, 500 pages in length. That conflicts with the "image" some have of "LE" just sitting around and doing nothing or not doing enough.
Until anything at all turns up to the contrary, this is still being treated and classified as a "voluntary" missing person case, as in "the scope and nature of the investigation."
May I also bring to your attention: Amaraan post that is fairly recent.
The temperature was 12º and there are reports that it was snowing lightly,
That would the the "light falling snow" that Cyberlaw saw in the picture with the dog.
Also there was a full moon that night, so again, when the CW said that he saw Maura, it was not "pitch" black as some had assumed. Plus headlight are great for seeing in the dark, especially a women running along side a road and trying to "hide" from approaching lights, probably not wanting to take the chance that the car was LE.
Why else would someone "want to hide" from an approaching car especially if that person as some had assumed "was in need of assistance" and had to "be rescued". Obviously if Maura felt that she was in danger or needed assistance she would not have hidden from "an approaching" vehicle.
So please don't assume Maura needed to be "rescued" that night, because obviously Maura did not feel the same way, as she "passed" up the chance to "be rescued". It was not like there were several cars passing her in rural New Hampshire in the evening and that this area "was busy".