It's getting closer to the end of the Sica trial. I've found it interesting as Sica had similar alibi to GBC & it was all circumstantial evidence.
Just noticed today a coincidence with the dates in that case & Allison's case. Both almost the same date in April even though nine years apart.
June 25, 2012 11:42AM
He said the defence claimed Sica was
at home between 11.10pm on April 20 2003 and 7am on April 21, 2003, when he picked up his children from his ex-wife's home.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...urders-jury-told/story-e6freon6-1226407519495
Some interesting info today from Judge Byrne...
"Lies told by an accused may point to guilt only if motivated by a consciousness of guilt," Justice Byrne said.
"For a lie to have a tendency to prove guilt, it must be a lie which an innocent person would not tell, and which was told for the reason that the accused perceived that the truth is inconsistent with his innocence."
What Justice Byrne explained is called the Edward's Direction.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...rdict-judge-20120625-20y5r.html#ixzz1yn4YHjGS
Edward's Direction...
Lies Told By The Defendant
(Consciousness of Guilt)
http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data...-lies-told-by-deft-consciousness-of-guilt.pdf