Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - NV NV - Steven T. Koecher, 30, Henderson, 13 Dec 2009 - #12
page 13 of this thread is where we talk about it, Ruby.
I am just stunned. Surely LL's and TH would say they tried to call him that day if they had. And call would go to his voice mail and it'd be on his cell phone call bill if they had.
So he is calling his landlord and employer (on Sunday) multiple times after walking away from his car and not returning to car during those hours when calls were made. LL I can only guess to say he anticipates having some money for rent due to whatever he is doing in LV that day. But his employer?
Of course we need to confirm all calls were outgoing which implies that neither LL or TH phones were going to voice mail or he hung up without leaving message and call doesn't show up on bill?
wow.
rd
There is a new posting on FB "help us find Steven Koecher" very interesting.
Does anyone else get the feeling the window washing was a front for something else?
There is a new posting on FB "help us find Steven Koecher" very interesting.
Does anyone else get the feeling the window washing was a front for something else?
It's unclear whether these were incoming or outgoing calls or texts.
*boggles*
I wonder what they were cleaning?
Though the fact that calls came through to SK after he apparently left the area make that seem less suspicious than it might have been.
are the pings that clear he left area right away?
rd
Hi sw, it's not unclear in conjunction with phone bill. If call were incoming and went to voice mail it would show on phone bill, wouldn't it?
If call were outgoing and it answered, even with voice mail, it would show up on phone bill if he left a voice mail, but not if didn't? I was asking about taht in previous post.
But LL and TH presumably would say if they were trying to call him that day or got a message. To have that activity and not say it is a huge deal.
On other hand for neither to have a voice mail left or for that matter not see his number in caller id of calls received that day also doesn't make sense.
If phone bill detail is different these days let me know, but I am thinking that voice mail used to be billed minutes same as talking.
Bottom line, with rules for billing and his phone bill along with pings would think we should be able to establish incoming or outgoing. I have to say that whether incoming or outgoing, I can't understand LL and TH not knowing about the phone calls Sunday afternoon.
rd
A lot of the pings were apparently in Whitney Ranch and never went back to SCA. Leading me to believe he never left Whitney Ranch area on his own.
Have we talked about Whitney Ranch before? The name is familiar but I don't see anything...
I don't know what my gut tells me. I believe he went to SCA looking for work and I believe he expected to return to his car.
Based on the pings, I think he left SCA with someone else and went to the Whitney Ranch area of Las Vegas/Henderson. Perhaps during that time, something went wrong? I think his movements and intentions were totally innocent and would be perceived as innocuous if he hadn't turned up missing.
But I'm completely open to the idea that I'm totally wrong.
I was referring to the cell phone records he said he saw. That is different than seeing the other, but I may have wrongly assumed.
What does everyone think of this new info?